High Court of Kerala
K.T. SANKARAN & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
Dharmarajan
Versus
State of Kerala rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala
CRL. A. No. 877 of 2002
Decided On: 04-04-2014
Penal Code 1860 - Section 361 - Evidence Act 1872 - Section 114A - Presumption under - Kidnapping - Unlawful custody of minor girl - Whether person who is alleged to have committed the offence under S.366 was a party to the offence of kidnapping - purpose of prostitution or illicit intercourse - Held, since the victim girl was in the convent school, the lawful guardian was the person who was lawfully entrusted with the care and custody of the minor girl, going by the the explanation. The offence was complete when the girl left the convent school and boarded the bus as instructed or commanded by the first accused - it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the person who is alleged to have committed the offence under S.366A was a party to the offence - expression "lets to hire" implies making over of a minor in perpetuity or for a term. The term "otherwise disposes of " is of wide import. It does not necessarily imply an actual change of possession.
K.T. Sankaran, J.
1. This Criminal Appeal reveals the sad story of a girl who was aged only sixteen years and four months at the relevant time and who was allegedly subjected to sexual abuse, rape and gang rape by more than forty persons at different places in the State of Kerala and in the State of Tamil Nadu. The name of the victim is withheld and she is described as 'the victim girl' in the judgment. The prosecution case in a nutshell is that the appellant (Dharmarajan), accused No.1 (Raju) and accused No.2 (Usha) hatched a criminal conspiracy to kidnap the victim girl from the lawful custody of her guardian and to subject her to sexual abuse and provide her to others for illicit sexual intercourse. In furtherance of the criminal conspiracy, the victim girl was kidnapped from the lawful custody on 16.1.1996, confined her secretly at several places in the State of Kerala and in Tamil Nadu and she was subjected to rape and gang rape by several persons by keeping the victim girl under illegal custody. It was also alleged that the appellant robbed her gold and silver ornaments during the period in which she was kept under illegal custody. The prosecution alleged that the victim girl was missing on 16.1.1996 and she came back to her father only on 26.2.1996 and the offences were committed during that period.
2. The victim girl was studying in the IXth standard at Little Flower Girls High School, a convent school, at Nallathanni, Munnar. Her father was the Postmaster of Munnar Post Office. The victim girl's mother was working as a Nurse in the hospital at Sooryanelli Estate. The father, mother and sister of the victim girl were residing in the quarters allotted to her mother at Sooryanelli Estate. The victim girl was studying for VIIIth standard at Mount Carmal Girls High School, Kottayam during 1994-95. She was staying in the school hostel. Later she discontinued her stay in the hostel and started staying at the house of her uncle Robert at Mundakkayam. While the victim girl was staying with her parents at Sooryanelli Estate, she was attending tuition classes conducted by one Kuttiyamma teacher at Devikulam. The victim girl used to travel along with her father in a bus called “Companion”, which was plying in Sooryanelli-Munnar- Devikulam route. The first accused Raju was working as the checker/conductor in the “Companion” bus. He got acquainted with the victim girl which gradually developed into a love affair. The prosecution alleged that the appellant (Dharmarajan), accused No.1 (Raju) and accused No.2 (Usha) hatched a criminal conspiracy to induce the victim girl to accompany Raju, her lover, and to take the victim girl out of lawful custody. Their idea was to take the victim girl to various places and to compel her for sexual intercourse with many persons.
3. The prosecution alleged that, during the relevant period, the victim girl used to travel in “Companion” bus from Sooryanelli to Devikulam for attending tuition classes. Her father used to travel in that bus from Sooryanelli to Munnar. Fathima, the victim girl's classmate in the tuition class, was her close friend. The victim girl had taken a photo album containing photos of her family members to the tuition class. The album was shown to Fathima as well. Fathima took the album for showing the same to her family members. However, when Fathima brought back the album to be given to the victim girl, she (Fathima) showed that album to her friends while travelling in the “Companion” bus. On seeing the album, accused No.1 (Raju) took that album and promised to Fathima that the album would be given to the victim girl. The album was kept by accused No.1 (Raju). The victim girl later joined Little Flower Girls High School at Nallathanni, Munnar for the next academic year. During that period, accused No.1 (Raju) used to meet her at the premises of the school compound during lunch interval on Fridays and also while travelling with her father from Sooryanelli to Munnar and
Allarakha K. Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Sucha Singh and another v. State of Punjab (AIR 2003 SC 3617)
Gurbachan Singh v. Satpal Singh and others (AIR 1990 SC 209
State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava (AIR 1992 SC 840
State of U.P. v. Chhoteylal (AIR 2011 SC 697)
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh, (1996) 2 SCC 384 : (1996 AIR SCW 998, Para 20
Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi) ((2006) 2 SCC 677)
Prakash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab ((2007) 1 SCC 1)
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Andhra Pradesh (2013 (4) KLT 632 (SC))
Yeshodharan v. State of Kerala (2004 (2) KLT 231)
Superintendent of Police, C.B.I and others v. Tapan Kr. Singh (AIR 2003 SC 4140)
Superintendent of Police, CBI/SIT v. Nalini and others ((1999) 5 SCC 253)
Noor Mohammad Mohd. Yoosaf Momin v. The State of Maharashtra (AIR 1971 SC 885)
Kehar Singh and others v. The State (Delhi Admn.) (AIR 1988 SC 1883
Gabbu v. State of M.P. ((2006) 5 SCC 740
State of Haryana v. Raja Ram (AIR 1973 SC 819)
Parkash v. State of Haryana (AIR 2004 SC 227)
State of Bihar v. Basawan Singh (AIR 1958 SC 500
Madho Ram and another v. State of U.P. (AIR 1973 SC 469)
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Haryana (AIR 1972 SC 2661)
Wahid Khan v. State of M.P. (AIR 2010 SC 1)
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Haryana (AIR 1972 SC 2661)
Madho Ram and another v. State of U.P. (AIR 1973 SC 469)
Sidheswar Ganguly v. The State of West Bengal, 1958 SCR 749 = (AIR 1958 SC 143).)
In Rafiq v. State of U.P. (AIR 1981 SC 559)
Aman Kumar and another v. State of Haryana (AIR 2004 SC 1497)
State of M.P. v. Dayal Sahu (AIR 2005 SC 3570)
Vijay alias Chinee v State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 8 SCC 191
Pandharinath v. State of Maharashtra ((2009) 14 SCC 537)
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Krishna Master and others ((2010) 12 SCC 324)
Brahm Swaroop and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh ((2011) 6 SCC 288)
State of U.P. v. M.K. Anthony, AIR 1985 SC 48
Bhajan Singh and others v. State of Haryana (AIR 2011 SC 2552)
State of U.P. v. Lakshmi ((1998) 4 SCC 336)
Sampath Singh v. State of Rajasthan, (1969) 1 SCC 367 : (AIR 1969 SC 956)
Rattan Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (1997) 4 SCC 161)
Ramdas and others v. State of Maharashtra ((2007) 2 SCC 170)
Abbas Ahmad Choudhary v. State of Assam ((2010) 12 SCC 115)
Narender Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) ((2012) 7 SCC 171)
Mohd. Faizan Ahmad alias Kalu v. State of Bihar ((2013) 2 SCC 131)
Lohit Kaushal v. State of Haryana ((2009) 17 SCC 106)
Uday v. State of Karnataka ((2003) 4 SCC 46)
Deelip Singh @ Dilip Kumar v State of Bihar ((2005) 1 SCC 88)
In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mangoram (2000 Cr.L.J.4027 = (2000) 7 SCC 224)
State of U.P. v. Chhoteylal (AIR 2011 SC 697)
Deelip Singh @ Dilip Kumar v. State of Bihar
Lalliram and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh ((2008) 10 SCC 69
Hanuman Prasad and others v. State of Rajasthan ((2009) 1 SCC 507
Pardeep Kumar v. Union Administration, Chandigarh ((2006) 10 SCC 608
Bhupinder Sharma v. State of H.P. ((2003) 8 SCC 551)
Lalliram and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh ((2008) 10 SCC 69)
Hanuman Prasad and others v. State of Rajasthan ((2009) 1 SCC 507)
Bhupinder Sharma v. State of H.P. ((2003) 8 SCC 551)
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh and others (AIR 1996 SC 1393)
Karnel Singh v. State of M.P. (AIR 1995 SC 2472)
Zindar Ali SK v. State of W.B. and another (AIR 2009 SC 1467)
Dayal Singh and others v. State of Uttaranchal (AIR 2012 SC 3046)
Chandra Kanth Lakshmi v. State of Maharashtra
Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar
State of Karnataka v. K. Yarappa Reddy
Sidheswar Ganguly v. State of West Bengal (AIR 1958 SC 143)
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat (AIR 1983 SC 753)
Bhajan Singh alias Harbhajan Singh and others v. State of Haryana (AIR 2011 SC 2552)
Rameshwar v. The State of Rajasthan, 1952 SCr 377 = (AIR 1952 SC 54)
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1972 SC 2661
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh and others (AIR 1996 SC 1393)
S.Ramakrishna v. State (AIR 2009 SC 885)
Ranjit Hazarika v. State of Assam ((1998) 8 SCC 635)
Rajinder alias Raju v. State of H.P. (AIR 2009 SC 3022)
State of U.P. v. M.K.Anthony (AIR 1985 SC 48)
and State of Rajasthan v. Om Prakash, AIR 2007 SC 2257
Prithu v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2009) 11 SCC 588)
Matadin and others v. State of U.P. (AIR 1979 SC 1234)
Jethamal Pithaji v. Assistant Collector of Customs (1974) 3 SCC 393)
Oma alias Omprakash and another v. State of Tamil Nadu ((2013) 3 SCC 440)
Raju and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh ((2008) 15 SCC 133)
Krishankumar Malik v. State of Haryana ((2011) 7 SCC 130)
State of Rajasthan v. Babu Meena ((2013) 4 SCC 206)
Vijayan Pillai v. State of Kerala (1989(2) KLJ 234)
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mangoram ((2000) 7 SCC 224).
Kuldeep K.Mahato v. State of Bihar ((1998) 6 SCC 420)
State of Rajasthan v N.K. (AIR 2000 SC 1812)
Yedla Srinivasa Rao Vs. State of A.P. (2006) 11 SCC 615
Pardeep Kumar v. Union Administration, Chandigarh ((2006) 10 SCC 608)
Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana ((2003) 2 SCC 143)
Priya Patel v. State of M.P. ((2006) 6 SCC 263)
Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana ((2003) 2 SCC 143)
Priya Patel v. State of M.P. ((2006) 6 SCC 263)
State of Karnataka v. K.Yarappa Reddy (AIR 2000 SC 185)
Karnel Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1995) 5 SCC 518 : (AIR 1995 SC 2472 : 1995 AIR SCW 3644);
Lallan Chaudhary and others v. State of Bihar and another ((2006) 12 SCC 229)
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others ((2012) 4 SCC 1)
Valsala v. State of Kerala (2012 (4) KLT 760)
Sheikh v. State of W.B. ((2013) 6 SCC 428); Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P. ((2013) 6 SCC 384
Firozuddin Basheeruddin and others v. State of Kerala ( AIR 2001 SC 3488)
Thakorlal D.Vadgama v. The State of Gujarat (AIR 1973 SC 2313)
State of Haryana v. Raja Ram (AIR 1973 SC 819)
Ram Bali v. State of U.P., AIR 2004 SC 2329 : (2004 AIR SCW 2748)
Inder Singh and another v. State (Delhi Admn.) (AIR 1978 SC 1091
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade and another v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1973 SC 2622)
State of A.P. v. Gangula Satya Murthy (AIR 1997 SC 1588)
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh and others (AIR 1996 SC 1393).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.