A.HARIPRASAD
SREEBALA – Appellant
Versus
EDWIN PEREIRA – Respondent
A. Hariprasad, J.
The judgment debtors/respondents in E.A.No.74 of 2009 in E.P.No.359 of 2005 in O.S.No.885 of 1960 on the file of the II Additional Munsiff Court, Thiruvananthapuram are the appellants. The said application was filed by the 22nd decree holder (the sole respondent in this proceedings) under Section 151 read with Order XXI Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, "the Code"). Prayer in the petition reads as follows:
"For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass an order in the above E.P. To evict the respondents from decree C schedule property and to remove the obstruction caused by the respondents by arresting them and detaining them in civil prison and to pass an order directing that the petitioner may be put into possession of the Decree C schedule property, in the interest of justice."
The execution petition was filed for effecting delivery of decree B and C schedule properties in terms of the final decree in a suit for redemption of mortgage. As per order dated 14.02.2007 in the execution petition, the properties were ordered to be delivered on 22.02.2007
Easwar Gangaram Pattil v. Uduppi Madhava Mandiram Trust (2012 (4) KLT 1)
Silverline Forum Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajiv Trust ((1998) 3 SCC 723)
Raj Kumar v. Sardari Lal ((2004) 2 SCC 601)
Brahmdeo Chaudari v. Rishikesh Prasad Jaiswal & another ((1997) 3 SCC 694)
Raman v. Karthikeyan (1984 KLT 1071)
Dasan Nadar Surendran v. Parameswaran Pilla Thankappan Nair and Another (2007 (4) KHC 39)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.