V.K.MOHANAN, A.HARIPRASAD
SINDHU P. K. – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR P. A. – Respondent
A. Hariprasad, J.
Review petitioner is the first respondent in an original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The first respondent herein is the petitioner in the above original petition. In the original petition, a direction was sought to the Judge, Family Court, Thiruvalla to draw up a decree in O.P(HMA) No.909/2008 in accordance with the judgment and a further direction to dispose of E.P.No.6 of 2013 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. This Court after hearing both sides disposed of the original petition directing the Court concerned to draft a decree in terms of Ext.P2 compromise executed and presented before the Court by the parties to the proceedings, leaving any challenge against the executability of the decree open to be agitated in appropriate proceedings.
3. Grievances of the review petitioner are mainly the following: The stipulation in Order XX Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, "CPC") that a decree shall agree with the judgment has been violated and so much so the direction to draft a decree in terms of the compromise is an error apparent on the face of the judgment. Secondly, the original petitioner sho
Jayalakshmi Coelho v. Oswald Joseph Coelho AIR 2001 SC 1084
Amteshwar Anand v. Virender Mohan Singh (2006) 1 SCC 148
uleman Noormohamed v. Umarbhai Janubhai (1978) 2 SCC 179: AIR 1978 SC 952
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai AIR 2003 SC 3044
Banerjee v. P.R. Mukharjee AIR 1953 SC 58
Trimbak Gangadhar Telang v. Ramchandra Ganesh Bhide AIR 1977 SC 1222
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale AIR 1960 SC 137
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.