SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ker) 738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
UMAIBAN U.P. CHAIR PERSON and Ors. – Petitioner
Vs.
THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHs and Ors. – Respondent
WP(C).No. 17138 of 2014 (N)
Decided On : 19.11.2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI.K.B.GANGESH
For the Respondent:R4-R6 & R8 BY ADV. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH, R4-R6 & R8 BY ADV. SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN, R4-R6 & R8 BY ADV. SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA, R4-R6 & R8 BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM, R1& R3 BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN, R4 TOR6 BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.)

Headnote:Lakshadweep Panchayats Regulation, 1994, Regulation 21(1)(c) - The law says that the meeting should be done in the prescribed manner the failure of coming to meeting will amount to the cessation of the membership and it will come into effect with the operation of the law.

JUDGMENT :

Petitioners are members of the Village Dweep Panchayat of Kavaratti Island ('the Panchayat', for short) under the Union Territory of Lakshadweep. Among them, the first petitioner was the Chairperson of the Panchayat. The petitioners seek in this writ petition, a declaration that the no confidence motion moved by the fifth respondent against the first petitioner in the meeting of the Panchayat held on 2.7.2014 is null and void and that the first petitioner is entitled to continue as the Chairperson of the Panchayat. They also seek a declaration that in view of the provision in Regulation 21 (1)(c) of the Lakshadweep Panchayats Regulation, 1994, respondents 4 to 6 have ceased to become the members of the Panchayat.

2. The petitioners were elected as the members of the Panchayat during 2012 and the elected members of the Panchayat in turn elected the first petitioner as the Chairperson and the fourth respondent as the Vice Chairperson of the Panchayat. On 13.6.2014, the fifth respondent gave a notice of no confidence motion against the first petitioner. Ext.P1 is the notice of no confidence motion. Ext.P1 notice of no confidence motion was addressed to the Chairperson, the Vice Chairperson and the Executive Officer of the Panchayat. A copy of the no confidence motion was submitted to the Director of Panchayats of Kavaratti island also. On receipt of a copy of the notice of no confidence motion, the Director of Panchayats, issued Ext.P2 communication to the Executive Officer of the Panchayat, directing him to take further action on the notice of no confidence motion in accordance with Regulation 29 of the Lakshadweep Panchayats Regulation, 1994 ('the Regulation', for short) and Rule 12 of the Lakshadweep Panchayats Business Rules, 1997 ('the Rules', for short). In the meanwhile, on 18.06.2014, the Executive Officer of the Panchayat placed the no confidence motion before the first petitioner, the Chairperson of the Panchayat and she has directed the Executive Officer to convene a meeting of the Panchayat on 02.07.2014 to consider the no confidence motion. Accordingly, Ext.P3 notice was issued to the members of the Panchayat by the Executive Officer of the Panchayat.

3. After having issued the notice for convening the meeting to consider the no confidence motion on 02.07.2014, the Executive Officer of the Panchayat issued Ext.P4 communication to the Director of Panchayats stating that respondents 4 to 6 have absented themselves for more than three consecutive meetings of the Panchayat and consequently they ceased to be the members of the Panchayat in view of the provision in Regulation 21(1)(c). As per Ext.P4, the Executive Officer of the Panchayat requested the Director to take appropriate action in the matter. In Ext.P4 communication, the dates on which the above respondents have consecutively absented from the meetings of the Panchayat were also mentioned. Ext.P4 communication was sent by the Executive Officer to the Director of Panchayats on 24.6.2014.

Thereupon, on 1.7.2014, the Executive Officer of the Panchayat issued Ext.P5 notice to all the members stating that the meeting scheduled as per Ext.P3 notice stands cancelled as it was found that the fifth respondent who has given the notice of no confidence motion ceased to be a member of the Panchayat. In the meanwhile, in response to Ext.P4 communication sent by the Executive Officer, the Director of Panchayats sent Ext.P7 communication to the Executive Officer stating that the matter of cessation of membership of the members has been examined by him and that since the members have resumed/participated in the subsequent meetings of the Panchayat, it is deemed that their absence has been condoned. As per Ext.P7, the Director of Panchayats has also directed the Executive Officer to make sure that the meeting proposed on 2.7.2014 is conducted in accordance with the provisions contained in the Regulation and the Rules.

4. Pursuant to Ext.P7 communication, Ext.P8 notice was i











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top