IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K.T. Sankaran, K.P. Jyothindranath, JJ.
S. Reshmi - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Rep by The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (Crl) Nos. 386, 416, 423 & 484 of 2015
Decided On : 28-01-2016
Constitution of India - Article 22(5) - Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3 - Mandatory - Detention documents - Supplied to detenu - Held, The expression "communicate to such person the grounds on which the order has been made" was interpreted in various judicial pronouncements and it is now well settled that the constitutional requirement under Article 22(5) would not be fulfilled by just serving the grounds of detention on the detenu.
Four persons, namely, Manu E.V., R. Krishnakumar, P.K. Shajahan and Muhammed Rasheed were detained as per the order dated 28.5.2015 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'COFEPOSA Act'). Manu E.V. And R. Krishnakumar were working as Assistant Central Intelligence Officers at the Kochi International Airport, while P.K. Shajahan and Muhammed Rasheed are travel agents at Angamali. It is alleged that on 7.1.2015 and 14.1.2015, one Ijaz Abdulla K., a passenger in Dubai-Kochi flight, illegally brought 4 kgs. each of gold to India. The further allegation is that Manu E.V. and R. Krishnakumar facilitated the movement of gold from Airport to outside on 7.1.2015 and also agreed to do so on 14.1.2015. It is also alleged that P.K. Shajahan, Muhamed Rasheed, Kunhayankutty @ Kutty and Imthiyaz constituted a smuggling syndicate and with the help of passengers from Dubai to Kochi and the two Assistant Intelligence Officers at Kochi International Airport smuggled large quantities of gold on more than thirty occasions. The CCTV footage at the Kochi International Airport on 26.12.2014 and 7.1.2015 were relied on to arrive at the conclusion of the smuggling activities indulged in by Manu E.V., R. Krishnakumar, P.K. Shajahan and Muhammed Rasheed. A compact disc containing the CCTV footage was furnished to the detenus, but no facility was provided for the detenus to view the CCTV footages till 11.7.2015.
2. The question involved in these Writ Petitions is whether the continued detention of the detenus is vitiated on the ground that the grounds of detention were not communicated as provided under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India, since the detenus were denied the opportunity to view the CCTV footages within the time provided under sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the COFEPOSA Act.
3. The orders of detention were issued on 28.5.2015. In execution of the orders of detention, Manu E.V., R. Krishnakumar and Muhammed Rasheed were arrested on 1.6.2015, while P.K. Shajahan was arrested on 20.6.2015. The grounds of detention were served on the detenus within five days of their date of detention. One of the documents relied on by the detaining authority in the grounds of detention is the CCTV footage at the arrival hall of the Kochi International Airport, Nedumbassery on 26.12.2014 and 7.1.2015.
4. The grounds of detention served on the detenus would reveal the following facts: Ijaz Abdulla agreed to smuggle gold from Dubai to India at the instigation of one Rafnas and Muhafiz who were working in Dubai. Ijaz Abdulla was directed to place the baggage containing gold bars at the TLP counter situated inside the Immigration Hall. On 7.1.2015, Ijaz Abdulla brought 4 kgs. of gold in a laptop bag and left the bag at the TLP counter and walked away. On the same day, Ijaz Abdulla left for Dubai from Nedumbassery Airport. On 14.1.2015, Ijaz Abdulla carried 4 kgs. of gold from Dubai via Dubai Kochi international flight. As per the directions issued to him, he was about to leave the bag containing gold at the TLP counter at the Kochi International Airport. However, the TLP counter was not seen by Ijaz Abdulla and in fact, the TLP counter was renamed as "Visa on Arrival Fee Collection Counter". Therefore, Ijaz Abdulla was not having any clear idea as to what should be done. He saw increased presence of customs officers in the Immigration Hall. Ijaz Abdulla was directed to proceed to the Immigration counter by the Customs Officers. He decided to go out through the customs green channel. However, the Customs Officials seized the gold from Ijaz Abdulla.
5. The Customs Officers recorded the statement of Ijaz Abdulla under Section 108 of the Customs Act on 15.1.2015, in which he narrated all the incidents. The facts revealed by Ijaz Abdulla led to the inspection of the CCTV footages. Thereafter, Manu E.V. and R. Krishnakumar were summoned and their statement
B. Sundar Rao v. State of Orissa
Frances Coralie Mullin v. W.C. Khambra
Golam alias Golam Mallick v. State of West Bengal
Haradhan Saha v. State of West Bengal
Harikisan v. State of Maharashtra
Icchu Devi Choraria v. Union of India
John Martin v. State of West Bengal
K.M. Abdulla Kunhi and B.L. Abdul Khader v. Union of India
Kamarunnissa v. Union of India
Kirit Kumar Chaman Lal Kundaliya v. Union of India
Kubic Dariusz v. Union of India
Lallubhai Jogibhai Patel v. Union of India
M. Ahamedkutty v. Union of India
Mangalbhai Motiram Patel v. State of Maharashtra
Mehrunissa v. State of Maharashtra
Mohd Zakir v. Delhi Administration
Pankaj Kumar Chakrabarty v. State of West Bengal
Pritam Nath Hoon v. Union of India
Ramachandra A. Kamat v. Union of India
Shayamal Chakraborty v. Commissioner of Police, Calcutta
Sk. Abdul Karim v. State of West Bengal
Sk. Sekawat v. State of West Bengal
State of Bombay v. Atma Ram Shridhar Vaidya
State of Punjab v. Jagdev Singh Talwandi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.