ALEXANDER THOMAS
Benny Daniel – Appellant
Versus
Gold Galaxy, represented by its Working Partner, Sun George Abraham – Respondent
1. The petitioner herein is the complainant in S.T.No.162/2003 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Pathanamthitta, in which respondents 1 and 2 herein, are arrayed as accused 1 and 2, alleging offence punishable under Sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The cheque amount covered by the dishonoured Ext.P-1 cheque dated 28.2.2003 is for Rs.2.5 lakhs, which is said to have been drawn by the 1st accused partnership firm, etc. The trial court as per the judgment rendered on 30.10.2004 has convicted both the accused for the abovesaid offence and has sentenced A-2 (managing partner of the partnership firm) to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and further that A-1 and A-2 shall pay Rs. 2.5 lakhs as compensation to the complainant in terms of Sec. 357(3) of the Cr.P.C. and in default thereof, A-2 shall undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Aggrieved thereby, respondents 1 and 2 herein had filed Crl.Appeal No.367/2004 before the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Pathanamthitta. The appellate sessions court as per the impugned judgment rendered on 9.2.2007 has allowed the appeal by ordering the acquittal of both accused 1 and 2.
2. The comp
City Board Mussorie v. Sri. Kishun Lal
Dukhishyam Sahu v. Bidyadhar Sahu
Delhi Administration v. Ram Singh
Krishanlal Oberoi v. Corpn. of Cochin
Municipal Commr. Nagercoil v. Annapakkiyam
Municipal Commissioner, Nagercoil v. Chinnammal
Pudhu Raja and another Vs. State
State (Union of India) v. Ram Saran
State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
Shibu Joseph & others v. Tomy K.J. & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.