BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
Sathianathan – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
Babu Mathew P. Joseph, J.
The petitioners challenge Ext.P1 order dated 26-10-2009 passed by the second respondent, who is the General Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Chennai, according sanction under Section 19(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) for prosecuting the petitioners and another for certain criminal offences.
2. The facts which are necessary for disposing of this writ petition are briefly stated as follows: The first petitioner is working as a Chief Manager and the second petitioner is working as a Manager in the Indian Overseas Bank, a nationalised bank. While they were working in the main branch of the Bank at Ernakulam from 2006 to 2009, they had advanced a loan of 100 lakh to M/s Karma Constructions, a proprietary concern of Sri. Binoy K. Ravindran, a businessman, after due enquiries and as a pure "C. R." commercial transaction. Before releasing the loan amount, prior sanction from the regional office of the Bank was also obtained. The transaction was perfectly transparent supported by application and collateral security. But, it was alleged that the loanee misused the loan for purposes other than the purpose for which the
Commr. of Police, Bombay v. Gordhandas Bhanji
Dinesh Kumar v. Chairman, Airport Authority of India
Kuntesh v. Management, H.K. Mahavidyalaya, Sitapur
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commr.
Parmanand Dass v. State of A.P.
Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. v. Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority
Subramanium Swamy v. Manmohan Singh & Anr.
Surat Ram Sharma v. State of Punjab
State of Bihar v. Rajmangal Ram
State of Maharashtra v. Mahesh G. Jain
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Paras Nath Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.