SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 868

K. A. ABDUL GAFOOR, K. P. BALACHANDRAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
V Gopalakrishnan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

1. This batch of writ petitioners are filed by the Union of India assailing a common judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam bench. The point mooted for debate is whether the Central Government Pensioners are entitled to the payment in terms of CS(MA) Rules, 1944 for the treatment they had undergone. Admittedly, the said Rules are applicable only for those in service. Fifth Pay Commission recommended to Central Government that the CS(MA) Rules, 1944 shall be extended to the Central Government Pensioners as well. The recommendation of the Fifth Pay Commission with regard to the revision of pay and other conditions of service had been implemented by issuing necessary orders. But the extension of CS(MA) Rules to the Pensioners was under correspondence. The Ministry of Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare in O. M. No.45/7497 PP and PW dated 15/04/1997 addressed the Department of Health Services with regard to the modalities for extension of the CS(MA) Rules and for evolving a scheme therefore. In reply, Annexure - A3 was issued conveying their 'No Objection' in implementing the scheme, but with the reservation that they would und








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top