SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 615

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
Pankajakshy – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of Travancore – Respondent


ORDER

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by counter petitioners 1, 2 and 4 in EA No. 397 of 2003 in OS No. 785 of 1989 on the file of the Principal Munsiff, Cherthala. The petitioners valued the above Civil Revision Petition above Rs. 1,000 and levied and paid court fee of Rs. 10 alone under Schedule II, item No. 11(P) of the unamended Court Fees Act. The Registry raised an objection that the court fee paid is insufficient. The petitioners contend that the court fee paid is sufficient since the matter arises in a suit filed prior to the amendment. The matter is placed before Court.

2. Notice was given to the State and Sri Mohan C. Menon, Senior Government Pleader appeared and argued the matter.

3. The short question arising for consideration is whether the petitioners are liable to pay the enhanced court fee as per the amended provision of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act or whether they need pay only the court fee as per the unamended provisions.

4. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against an order passed by the executing court in execution of a money decree. The suit was filed in the year 1989. The EP was also filed on 18th October 2001. Thereafter the provisio







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top