SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 786

P.R.RAMAN
Marykutty George – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P. R. Raman, J.

1. The above Writ Petitions raises common question of law and fact and hence they are disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Petitioners in W. P. (C) Nos. 4354, 6582, 8413, 6562, 6731 and 9026/2005 are all licensees of shop rooms in the shopping complex owned by Pandalam Grama Panchayat -- the second respondent in W. P. (C) No. 4354/2005. Since the petitioners are all similarly situated persons and the facts being common, it will be sufficient to refer to the facts stated in W. P. (C) No. 4354/2005.

3. Petitioners as stated earlier, are licensees in occupation of the stalls belonging to the second respondent Pandalam Grama Panchayat. The first petitioner in O.P.No.4354/2005 was thus in occupation of stall No. 1 since 1967, doing textile business and the 2nd petitioner was in occupation of stall Nos.2 and 9 for the past 34 years and he was doing bakery business in the said stall. Third petitioner who was occupying stall No. 14, was doing business in ladies shopping centre. The third respondent filed a petition before the Grama Panchayat, on 12.2.2004 requesting to allot the shop rooms by public auction after the expiry of the period of licence in favour of the








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top