ANTONY DOMINIC, DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
Marine Fins, Kochi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Industry – Respondent
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Introduction:
1. Central Government, through a notification, banned the export of shark fins. Internationally too “shark fining” is a detestable fishing activity, leading to environmental and ecological calamities. The Government first imposed this ban in 2001, relaxed it the same year. But, again, in 2015, re-imposed it.
2. One marine produce exporter, dealing exclusively in shark fins, assails the ban. It argues that India stands on a different footing, and the international parameters have no application here. It also questions the prohibition as ultra-vires of the Government power under the relevant statutes. We will examine whether the Government’s action sustains itself.
Case in Brief:
3. Marine Fins, a proprietary concern, deals in import and export of marine products. It exports mainly dried shark fins to North-East countries. Though dried shark fin has no domestic use, it has a high demand in North-East countries, especially China.
4. In 2001 Union of India issued the Gazette Notification No. SO 665(E) dated 11.7.2001; it banned catching of all species of Shark in India, treating it as an endangered animal under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 19
Ashif Hamid vs. State of J & K
Dai-ichi Karkaria Ltd. vs. Union of India
Federation of Railway Officers Association vs. Union of India
Hasmattullah vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Marine Products Exporters Association vs. Union of India
Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India
State of Orissa vs. Gopinath Dash
Union of India vs. International Trading Co. (2003) 5 SCC 437
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.