The petitioner, who is an accountant in the 5th respondent Service Co-operative Bank, is placed under suspension, while holding charge as Branch Manager, Janmamkulam Branch, by Ext.P1 order dated 07.02.2018 issued by the President of the said Bank. Thereafter, he was issued with Ext.P3 charge memo, along with Ext.P4 statement of allegations. On receipt of Exts.P3 and P4, the petitioner submitted Ext.P5 explanation. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that by Ext.P7 order dated 07.08.2018 issued by the President of the Bank, the period of suspension stands extended, on the ground that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him could not be completed within six months from the date of suspension. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P7, the petitioner moved Exts.P8 and P9 representations before respondents 2 and 3. The petitioner is before this Court in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P7 order issued by the President of the Bank, whereby the period of suspension stands extended. The petitioner has also sought for other consequential relief’s, including a writ of mandamus commanding the respond