K. HARILAL, J.

1. Since these revisions arise out of one and the same judgment, both revisions are heard together and disposed of accordingly. These revision petitions have been filed, challenging the judgment allowing R.C.A.No.18/2017 in part and dismissing R.C.A.No.29/2017, passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kollam. (The parties are referred to as in the Rent control petition). The petitioners-landlord filed R.C.P.No.24/2012 before the Principal Rent Control Court, Kollam seeking an order of eviction under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 [for short, the Act]. According to the petitioners, the petition schedule shop room, which was leased out to the respondent, belonged to the first petitioner. Since the first petitioner is working abroad, the second petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule shop room. The rent was in arrear and the petitioners bona fide require the petition schedule building for starting a hotel business for the first petitioner. The first petitioner has been working abroad since the last more than 30 years, and he decided to return from the Gulf country a