District Town Planner Malappuram – Appellant
Versus
Vinod S/o. Sreedharan Nair – Respondent
HRISHIKESH ROY, J.
1. The Thalassery Municipality and their functionaries have preferred these Writ Appeals. They are represented by their learned Standing Counsel, Sri.I.V.Pramod. The respondents-writ petitioners are represented respectively by S/Sri.K. Abdul Jawad, R.Surendran, T.M.Abdul Latheef, M.Sasindran, Deepak Raj, and Rajesh V. Nair, the learned counsel. The learned Senior Government Pleaders S/Sri.Tek Chand and Surin George Ipe represent the State authorities.
2. The issues are common in these Appeals and the matters are heard analogously. Therefore the following judgment will dispose of all the Appeals. For the sake of convenience, the primary facts are extracted from the W.A.No.1154/2019.
3. The writ petitioner, as the owner of land within the limits of Thalassery Municipality, applied for building permit to construct shops and office building. The authority in the Local Self Government Department of the Thalassery Municipality, rejected the application, on the ground that the building site is proposed for construction of a road in the Town Development Plan for the Thalassery Town. Aggrieved by the said decision, the land owner approached this Court. Similar deci
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.