A. HARIPRASAD, N. ANIL KUMAR
Subair. T. P @ Subu, S/o. Pareeth Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Represented By National Investigating Agency – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
1. Primacy of witnesses in the adjudication of disputes, especially in the dispensation of criminal justice, is a well known fact recognised from time immemorial. Dharma Sasthras postulate that credible witnesses are the most important element from the point of view of oral evidence. A witness, according to Shukra Neethi, is a person other than the party, who has some knowledge of the transaction in dispute. Saintly jurist Manu said a person becomes a witness because he has either seen or heard something relevant. Kautilya @ Chanakya, ancient Indian teacher, philosopher, economist, jurist and royal advisor, in his Arthasasthra, a text dated to roughly between 2nd and 3rd century BCE, in Book III, concerning law, deals with the importance of witnesses in trials. Importance of taking oath by a witness is also dealt with therein.
2. Jeremy Bentham (1747-1832), an English philosopher, jurist and social reformer, said : “Witnesses are eyes and ears of justice”. If the witnesses themselves are incapacitated or prevented from acting as eyes and ears of justice, trial becomes nugatory, worthless, trivial and meaningless. That may even sacrifice the sublime concept
Mahender Chawla v. Union of India
Bimal Kaur Khalsa v. Union of India and others
Kartar Singh and another v. State of Punjab and another
Government of Karnataka v. Smt.Gowramma
State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra
Union of India and Ors. v. Dhanwanti Devi
People's Union for Civil Liberties and another v. Union of India (2004) 9 SCC 580
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.