A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MCP Enterprises, Represented By Its Executive Partner Mr. M. C. Mohammed Kutty – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented By Secretary, Taxes Department, Secretariat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
In these batch of writ petitions, the petitioner/assessees impugn the pre-assessment notices/assessment orders issued to them to complete assessments of escaped turnover by invoking the provisions of Section 42(3) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “KVAT Act”]. It is the common case in all these writ petitions that the period envisaged for re-opening assessments under Section 25 of the KVAT Act had expired by the time the notices for re-opening assessments, invoking Section 42(3) of the KVAT Act, were issued to them. The petitioners therefore contend that in such cases, the Revenue cannot invoke Section 42(3) of the KVAT Act to re-open assessments that have already become final under the KVAT Act.
2. To appreciate the issue raised in these writ petitions, one has to first notice the statutory provisions under the KVAT Act. As per the Scheme of the KVAT Act, the assessment procedure commences with the filing of a return by the assessee. If the return filed by the assessee conforms to the requirement under the KVAT Act and Rules, in respect of the details of turnover to be furnished and the tax to be paid thereon, and there is no query raised b
Rai Ramkrishna v. State of Bihar
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi v. Vatika Township Private Limited
Ghanshyam Das v. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Nagpur
Anandji Haridas and Co. (P) Ltd. v. S.P. Kasture and Others
State of Gujarat and Another v. Patel Ramjibhai Danabhai and Others
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. K.T. Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India and Others v. Uttam Steel Limited
Chhedi Lal Yadav and Others v. Hari Kishore Yadav (Dead) Through Legal representatives and Others
Southern Motors v. State of Karnataka and Others
Union of India v. G.M. Kokil & Others
South India Corporation (P) Ltd. v. Secretary, Board of Revenue, Thiruvananthapuram & another
Municipal Corporation Indore & Others v. Smt. Rethna Prabha & Others
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Narendar
Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorolla IMS
Parayankandiyal Eravath Kanapravan Kalliani Amma v. K. Devi
Regional Assistant Commissioner Indore v. Malva Vanaspathi & Chemical Company Ltd.
Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd. and Others v. State of Haryana and Others
M.P. Sundararamier & Company v. State of Andhra Pradesh
M/s. J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Bahuji v. Municipal Committee, Khandwa
Cheviti Venkanna Yadav v. State of Telungana and Others
State of Karnataka and others v. Karnataka Pawn Brokers Association and Others
Mr. Jadao Bahuji v. The Municipal Committee, Khandwa and another
M/s. Raghubar Dayal Jai Parkash and Others v. The Union of India and another
R.C. Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. Union of India and Another
Jayam and Company v. Assistant Commissioner and Another
State of Gujarat v. Patel Raghav Natha and Others
State of Punjab and Others v. Bhatinda District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd.
New Delhi v. Vatika Township Private Limited
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.