IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, J.
M.P. Varghese S/o. Pathrose - Appellant
Versus
Annamma Yacob W/o. Yacob & Ors. - Respondents
MFA No.47 of 2020
Decided On : 05-08-2020
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 57 ;;Code of Civil Procedure- Order XXXIV , Section 83 -Whether the sale been conducted by the court or in execution of a decree or by parties outside court-17- Power under Section 57 of the TP Act -Permits the court to declare a property free of encumbrance even against the will of the encumbrancer and even in the case of sales not directed by Order XXXIV of the CPC-The section cannot be applied when it comes to a charge or encumbrance already adjudicated by a court and which has become part of a decree or even in a case of adjustment of a decree out of court.
Statement of facts:
The realisation of the deserving and intrinsic value of encumbered estates and other immovable properties -within the annals of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - The provision in reference is Section 57 of the TP Act, which enables any party to the sale of immovable property burdened by an encumbrance, to apply to Court for a declaration that the said property is freed from such encumbrance on deposit of sums to be adjudged by it; and for the issuance of an order of conveyance or vesting order, proper for giving effect to the sale.
Finding of the court:
Issue necessary directions and declarations in favour of the appellant within the purlieus of Section 57 of the TP Act- The appellant is entitled to a declaration under Section 57 of the TP Act, since the first respondent has shown no legally acceptable cause whatsoever against such-On such payment by the appellant, the petition schedule property will stand freed from the charge on it, created as per the terms of the Partition Deed, Document No.1873/1980 of the Puthencruz SRO.
Result: Appeal Allowed
JUDGMENT :
A very efficacious, substantive and procedural mechanism to facilitate the realisation of the deserving and intrinsic value of encumbered estates and other immovable properties -within the annals of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ('the TP Act' for short) -strangely appears very rarely to have been invoked in Courts, which impression is inevitable because the case law on it is scarce, if not, none.
2. The provision in reference is Section 57 of the TP Act, which enables any party to the sale of immovable property burdened by an encumbrance, to apply to Court for a declaration that the said property is freed from such encumbrance on deposit of sums to be adjudged by it; and for the issuance of an order of conveyance or vesting order, proper for giving effect to the sale.
3. The apparent fact that this Section, though in the TP Act for the past more than a century and quarter, has attracted little or no reported judgments anywhere in India, obligates me to examine it very closely and carefully from both its academic and practical ambit.
4. This Section of the TP Act is, with the exception of its last two sub sections, almost verbatim of Section 5 of the English Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, 1881 ('the English Act' for short), which reads as below:
(2) Thereupon, the court may, if it thinks fit, and either after or without any notice to the incumbrancer, as the court thinks fit, declare the land to be freed from the incumbrance, and make any order for conveyance, or vesting order, proper for giving effect to the sale, and give directions for the retention and investment of the money in court.
(3) After notice served on the persons interested in or entitled to the money or fund in court, the court may direct payment or transfer thereof to the persons entitled to receive or give a discharge for the same, and generally may give directions respecting the application or distribution of the capital or income thereof.
(4) This section applies to sales not completed at the commencement of this act, and to sales thereafter made.”
5. After adopting the afore Section of the English Act (which, subsequently, was replaced by Section 50 of the Law of Property Act, 1925 in England) with minor modifications like substituting the word 'land' with 'immovable property' or adding that the words 'in execution of a decree' along with sale by court or out of court and such other, Section 57 of the TP Act, through sub-sections (d) and (e) thereof, enable an appeal from any declaration, order or directions issued by a Court thereunder, as if it were a decree and stipulates that 'Court' in this section means either a High Court in the exercise of its ordinary or extraordinary original civil jurisdiction; or the Court of a District Judge within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property or any part thereof is situated; or any other Court which the State Government may, from time
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.