2020 Supreme(Ker) 595
Iype Varghese – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. R. Ramadas, Adv.
For the Respondent: Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty, Sr. Govt. Pleader, Sri. Unnikrishnan V. Alappatt, SC
JUDGMENT :
The case set up in this Writ Petition (Civil) is as follows:
That the petitioner is the co-owner of 6.07 Ares of land in Sy. Nos. 151/3-1-1, 151/6-1-1-2 and 151/6-2-1-2 of Thodupuzha village. The other co-owners of the property are petitioners children, Joseph Varghese and George Varghese. The above property is a dry land. The petitioner's predecessor had sought permission from the 1st respondent for constructing a building after filling the land under the Kerala Land Utilization Order. On the basis of the above application, the Revenue Divisional Officer conducted enquiry and on the basis of the reports submitted by the Tahsildar, Thodupuzha and the Village Officer, Thodupuzha, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P1 Order stating that since there was no paddy cultivation in the land in question from 1961-1962 onwards, there is no need for permission under the Kerala Land Utilisation of Order. In this connection it is urged that as per the proviso to Section 27A(3) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land where the application is allowed, is filled up or naturally filled up before the 4th day of July, 1967, the date of commencement of the Kerala Land Utilisation Ord



Click Here to Read the rest of this document