SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH
Hasna S. K. – Appellant
Versus
S. K. Haridas – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M. Ramesh Chander, Senior Advocate and Sri. Aneesh Joseph, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. George Cherian, Senior Advocate

JUDGMENT :

C.T. Ravikumar, J.

The captioned appeals arise from the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thalassery in O.P. (M.V)No.1247 of 2002. The former appeal has been preferred by the petitioner in the said claim petition seeking for enhancement of the compensation granted by the Tribunal and the latter appeal has been preferred by the insurance company of the offending vehicle viz., the 3rd respondent before the Tribunal, seeking to set aside the award to the extent the Tribunal had declined its prayer for exoneration from the liability to indemnify the insured owner of the said vehicle. True that, alternatively, as an abundant caution, the appellant-insurance company has also mounted challenge against the quantum of compensation on the ground of exorbitancy. A succinct narration of the facts and circumstances that led to the filing of the said claim petition is required for a proper disposal of this appeal.

2. The appellant in the former appeal, viz., the petitioner met with the accident in question, on 1.4.2002 at the age of nine years. On th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top