BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
District Collector, Alappuzha – Appellant
Versus
District Legal Service Authority Alappuzha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A question of seminal importance has arisen in this case. The query raised relates to the victim compensation scheme under Section 357A(4) of Cr.P.C. and its applicability. Is the provision retrospective or prospective in its application? To paraphrase the query: Would the victim, of a crime that occurred prior to 31.12.2009, be entitled to claim compensation under Section 357A(4) of the Cr. P.C.
2. The facts, though not relevant to be narrated in detail, is in a nutshell as follows:
3. Pursuant to the application, an enquiry, as contemplated under Section 357A(5) Cr.P.C, was conducted through the Additional District Judge, Alappuzha, who was appoin
Abdul Majeed C.M. and Others v. Mohammad Shafeque @ Shafeeque and Others
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra
Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)-I New Delhi v. Vatika Township Private Limited
District Collector, Vellore District v. K.Govindaraj
Hari Singh v. Sukhbir Singh and Others
Mohammed Haroon and Others v. Union of India and Another
Sathya Prabha v. State of Kerala
Sree Bank Ltd. (in liquidation) v. Sarkar Dutt Roy & Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.