SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1320

Y. K. SABHARWAL, C. K. THAKKER, R. V. RAVEENDRAN
YOUARAJ RAI – Appellant
Versus
CHANDER BAHADUR KARKI – Respondent


Judgment

C.K. THAKKER, J. - Appeals admitted.

2. All the above three appeals raise an interesting and important question of law as to interpretation of Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

3. In all these appeals, facts are more or less similar. The Election Commission of India issued a notification on 16 - 3 - 2004 for holding general election to the Legislative Assembly for the State of Sikkim. Total constituencies were 32. A programme was published which provided various stages of election. 23 - 4 - 2004 was the last date for filing nomination papers, 24 - 4 - 2004 was fixed for scrutiny of nomination papers, 26 - 4 - 2004 was the last date for withdrawal of candidatures, 10 - 5 - 2004 was the date of poll, if necessary, and date of counting and declaration of results was fixed as 17 - 5 - 2004. The appellants filed their nomination papers from 12 - Wak Assembly Constituency, 14 - Melli Assembly Constituency and 13 - Damthang Assembly Constituency respectively on 23 - 4 - 2004. When nomination papers were scrutinised on the next date i.e. 24 - 4 - 2004, they were found to be defective and hence all their nomination pape













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top