R.NARAYANA PISHARADI
G. Santhosh Kumar S/o S. Govindan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Whether an Assistant Commissioner of the Sales Tax Department, who passes an order of assessment of tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the KVAT Act’) is entitled to get the protection envisaged under the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985? Answer to this question would decide the fate of this application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’).
2. The petitioner was the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Commercial Taxes, Thrissur. He is the first accused in the case C.C. No. 6/2020 on the file of the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur. The second accused in the case was the Managing Director of the company by name M/s. Nano Excel Enterprises Private Limited. The third accused in the case is the Sales Tax Practitioner who had allegedly acted as a mediator between the first and the second accused. The offences alleged against the accused in the case are punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ‘the PC Act’) and also under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per a letter dated 25.06.2011, the C
Appukutty vs. Sales Tax Officer
Abdul Aziz Ansari vs. State of Bombay
Anwar Hussain vs. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
General Officer Commanding vs. C.B.I. AIR 2012 SC 1890
Jaswant Sugar Mills vs. Lakshmi Chand
Orient Paper Mills Limited vs. Union of India
Ramesh Chennithala vs. State of Kerala
Surendra Kumar Bhatia vs. Kanhaiya Lal
S.P. Goel vs. Collector of Stamps
State of Kerala vs. K.T. Shaduli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.