IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.V.Bhatti, Bechu Kurian Thomas, JJ.
M/s Shri Amman Dhall Mill – Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Customs - Respondent
Cus.Appeal.No.13 & 14 of 2020
Decided On : 22-01-2021
Customs Act - Import Policy - Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Notifications dated 18.12.2019 and 28.3.2020 - The Appellate Tribunal directed the release of subject goods on payment of redemption fine of Rs.12,00,000 and upheld the penalty of Rs.4,00,000 imposed by the Commissioner. The judgment discusses the restrictions on import of peas, the exercise of discretion by the Customs Commissioner, and the legal provisions governing the release of goods and imposition of penalties.
Fact of the Case:
The case involves Customs Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning the release of subject goods and the imposition of a penalty. The subject goods, green peas, were imported in violation of the import policy and were subject to a redemption fine of Rs.12,00,000 and a penalty of Rs.4,00,000.
Finding of the Court:
The Appellate Tribunal directed the release of subject goods on payment of redemption fine of Rs.12,00,000 and upheld the penalty of Rs.4,00,000 imposed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal's decision was based on its interpretation of the Customs Act, 1962, and the notifications issued by the Government regarding import restrictions on peas.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the nature of the subject goods (restricted or prohibited), the exercise of discretion by the Customs Commissioner, and the legality of the penalty imposed on the importer.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Appellate Tribunal erred in ordering the release of the subject goods, as the exercise of discretion by the Customs Commissioner was in line with the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and the notifications governing import restrictions. The Court also upheld the imposition of the penalty on the importer.
Final Decision: Customs Appeal No.13 of 2020 was dismissed, and Custom Appeal No.14 of 2020 was allowed.
JUDGMENT :
S.V.Bhatti, J.
Heard learned ASG N.Venkataraman and learned Adv.P.A.Augustine for parties.
2. The instant Customs Appeals are under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short 'Act 1962) and are at the instance of M/s Shree Amman Dhal Mill/Importer and the Commissioner of Customs, Kochi/Revenue. For convenience, the parties are referred to as 'Importer' and 'Revenue' respectively. The appeals are directed against final order No.20845/2020 dated 16.12.2020 of the CEST Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore. The appellate Tribunal through the impugned order dated 16.12.2020 held and directed as follows:
3. Hence, Customs Appeal No.13 of 2020 is at the instance of Importer challenging the levy of penalty of Rs.4 lakhs and Customs Appeal No.14 of 2020 is at the instance of Revenue questioning the release of subject goods on payment of redemption fine of Rs.12 lakhs.
4. The undisputed circumstances leading to the filing of Customs Appeals are stated thus:-
The Union of India in exercise of power under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 referred to as FTDR Act issued Notification No.37/2015-2020 dated 18.12.2019. The said notification is followed by Notification No.1225(E) dated 28.3.2020. The notifications have bearing on the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the parties and we find it useful to excerpt the respective notifications hereunder:
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
Department of Commerce
Directorate General of Foreign Trade
Notification No.37/2015-2020
New Delhi, dated: 18th December, 2019
Subject: Amendment in import policy and Policy condition under HS code 0713 1000 of Chapter 7 of ITC (HS), 2017, Schedule-I (Import Policy).
S.O.(E): In exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of FT (D&R) Act, 1992, read with paragraph 1.02 and 2.01 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020, as amended from time to time, the Central Government hereby amends import policy and policy conditions under HS code 0713 1000 of Chapter 7 of ITC (HS), 2017, Schedule-(Import Policy), as under:
| Exim code | Item Description | Existing import policy | Revised policy | Existing Policy condition | Revised Policy condition |
| 0713 10 00 | Peas (Pisum sativum)including Yellow Peas, Green Peas, Dun Peas and Kaspa Peas | Restricted | Restricted and subject to Minimum Import Price (MIP)Rs.200/-CIF per kg. | Import of Peas shall be subject to an annual (fiscal year) quota of 1.5 lakh MT as epr procedure notified by DGFT. This Restriction shall not apply to Government's import commitments under any Bilateral or Regional Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding | Import of Peas shall be subject to an annual (fiscal year)quota of 1.5 lakh MT as epr procedure notified by DGFT and it will be subject to Minimum Import Price (MIP) of Rs.200/-and above CIF per kilogram and import is allowed through Kolkata sea port only. This Restriction shall not apply to Government's import commitments under any Bilateral or Regional Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding |
This issues with the approval of Minister of Commerce & Industry.
Sd/-
(DIWAKAR NATH MISRA)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India
(F.No.14/3/2018-EP(Agri.III)
Note : The principal notification No.36/201
Ambica Industries v Commissioner of Central Excise
Bangalore Tetra v Regional Director ESI
Garg Woolen Mills v Additional Collector of Customs
Om Prakash Batia v Commissioner of customs
PTR Exports (Madras) Pvt. Ltd v Union of India
SB International Ltd and others v Assistant Directorate General of Foreign Trade and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of discretion by the Customs Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal must conform to the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and....
(1) Personal interests of importers who made improper imports are pitted against interests of national economy and more particularly, interests of farmers. Imposition of penalty on such importers is ....
Denial of redemption options in cases of absolute confiscation is lawful when goods are prohibited under the Customs Act due to non-compliance with Minimum Import Prices.
Wilful suppression and misstatement in job work exports using wrong scheme code justifies extended limitation under Section 28(4) and substantial pre-deposit; prior rulings inapplicable if facts diff....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.