IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
Satheesh S/o Sadanandan – Petitioner
Versus
The Travancore Devaswom Board – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 23704 of 2021
Decided On : 18-11-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 92 - Order XXIII, Rule 3A - Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 10 – Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 118, 198A - Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 - Section 84 - Motor Vehicles (Driving) Regulations, 2017 - Regulation 5 - Kerala Public Ways (Restriction of Assemblies and Processions) Act, 2011 - Section 5 - Regulation of conduct of festivals, assemblies, meetings, etc - Petitioner is a resident under the administrative control of 1st respondent - Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 as well as 6th respondent-Station House Officer of Police Station to remove shops put up on road margin and land on side, which lies on northern and eastern side, in connection with annual festival - Whether designated authority responsible for maintenance of road knew, or could reasonably have been expected to know, that condition of part of road to which action relates was likely to cause danger to road users - Whether designated authority responsible for maintenance of road could not reasonably have been expected to repair that part of road before cause of action arose - Whether adequate warning notices through road signs, of its condition had been displayed.
Finding of the court:
Respondents herein to take necessary steps to ensure strict compliance of directions contained in judgment and law laid down in decisions, in letter and spirit, by ensuring that any temporary stalls erected in connection with any festival is without any encroachment whatsoever on right of way or on pedestrian facilities provided as per relevant Specifications and Standards , in order to ensure safety of most vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly and differently-abled persons, and also to ensure free movement of vehicular traffic through carriage way of those roads and service road on side of National Highway - Directions contained in judgment regarding fixation of boundary of property and preparation of layout of temporary shops to be erected during festival season, shall be complied with by concerned respondents, within the time limit fixed by Court.
Result: Writ petition disposed of
JUDGMENT :
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.
1. The petitioner is a resident of Vallethodu near Thuravoor Mahakshethram, a temple under the administrative control of the 1st respondent Travancore Devaswom Board. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 as well as the 6th respondent-Station House Officer of Kuthiyathodu Police Station to remove the shops put up on the road margin and the land on the side of Chavadi-Thuravoor Junction Road and National Highway-66, which lies on the northern and eastern side of Thuravoor Mahakshethram, in connection with the annual festival which commenced on 27.10.2021. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 6th respondent Station House Officer to ensure free flow of traffic through Chavadi-Thuravoor Junction Road and National Highway-66, during the annual festival in Thuravoor Mahakshethram, which commenced on 27.10.2021.
2. On 29.10.2021, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board took notice on admission for respondents 1 to 3. The learned Government Pleader took notice on admission for respondents 4 to 6. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board and also the learned Government Pleader were directed to get instructions from the officers concerned. Registry was directed to show the name of the learned Advocate Commissioner appointed in W.P. (C) No. 22291 of 2021 in the cause list and list the matter on 30.10.2021 at 10.15 a.m. in a special sitting, along with that writ petition. In the order dated 29.10.2021 this Court noticed the order dated 18.01.2013 of the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) No. 8519 of 2006 [Union of India vs. State of Gujarat and Others], whereby the Apex Court issued a general direction to the effect that from the date of that order the Government of Kerala shall not grant any permission for installation of any statue or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places. In the said order the Apex Court made it clear that the said order shall not apply to installation of high-mast lights, street lights or construction relating to electrification, traffic, toll or for development and beautification of streets, highways, roads, etc. and relating to public utility and facilities.
3. On 30.10.2021 the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board has filed a statement on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, producing therewith Annexure R1(a) relevant extract of the land register pertaining to Thuravoor Devaswom. Along with I.A. No. 1 of 2021 the petitioner has placed on record Ext.P10 series of photographs showing the panthal erected over the public road on the northern side of Thuravoor Mahakshethram and also the temporary stalls put up on either side of Chavadi-Thuravoor Junction Road. The petitioner has also filed additional affidavit dated 29.10.2021 explaining how he got the notice dated 24.10.2021, which is marked as Ext.P1 in the writ petition.
4. On 30.10.2021, it was submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board that, as stated in paragraph 3 of the statement, Thuravoor Mahakshethram is situated in Sy. No. 171/4B of Thuravoor South Village and the property having an extent of 6 Acres and 66 cents, which includes kshethram, kshethrakulam and the properties situated nearby. Towards the eastern side of the kshethrakulam, the Temple is having an extent of 38 cents, out of which an extent of 8.44 cents was taken for road widening and now 6 Acres and 29 cents of land is with the Devaswom. Along with the statement, the relevant extract of the Land Register pertaining to Thuravoor Devaswom is placed on record as Annexure R1(a). The learned Senior Counsel submitted that Chavadi- Thuravoor Junction Road was laid through Devaswom property. The learned Senior Counsel pointed out that the boundary on the southern si
Achuthan Pillai vs. State of Kerala
A.A. Gopalakrishnan vs. Cochin Devaswom Board
A.A. Gopalakrishnan vs. Secretary, Cochin Devaswom Board
Basil Attipetti vs. State of Kerala and Others
Gopalakrishnan vs. Cochin Devaswom Board
Nandakumar vs. District Collector and Others
Prayar Gopalakrishnan and Another vs. State of Kerala and Others
Sodan Singh vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Sreekumar V. vs. Travancore Devaswom Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.