K.VINOD CHANDRAN, C.JAYACHANDRAN
...... – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
1. Spousal discord inflated to personal vendetta is disastrous, if minor daughter is made a sword against the father, accusing a tabooed depravity is the sheet anchor of the appellant's arguments in this appeal, filed under the Proviso to Section 372, Cr.P.C.
2. This victim appeal is directed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Court No. I (Special Court), Pathanamthitta in S.C. No. 314/2017 dated 27.2.2020, as per which, the accused persons - father of the victim and his friend - were found not guilty of offences under Section 376, read with Section 34 of the Penal Code and Section 4, read with Sections 3, 6 and 5 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The prosecution case:
3. The accused persons committed rape, sexual assault and penetrative sexual assault on the minor daughter of the first accused several times during December, 2015 and February, 2016 by caressing her breasts, fingering her vagina and by doing cunnilingus at A1's bedroom in House No. 304 of Ward No. XIV, Paranthal, Thekkekara Village, Pandalam, thus committing the offences under Section 376, read with Section 34 of the Penal Code and Section 4, read
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri vs. State of Gujarat
Chandran and Others vs. State of Kerala and Others
Chandrappa vs. State of Karnataka
C. Antony vs. K.G. Raghavan Nair
Gangadhar @ Gangaram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Khedu Mohton and Others vs. State of Bihar
Kumar Exports vs. Sharma Carpets
Noor Khan vs. State of Rajasthan
Naresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Ramanand Yadav vs. Prabhu Nath Jha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.