S.MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P.CHALY, SATHISH NINAN
Sabeena E. K. , D/o. Kasim – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Ernakulam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
This batch of writ petitions have come up before us on a reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court, as per the Order dated 14th day of September, 2020 in W.P.(C) No. 18356 of 2020 and connected cases, and orders subsequently made in the other writ petitions, doubting the correctness of a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Yousuf Chalil v. State of Kerala [2019 KHC 5618=2019(4) KLT 540=ILR 2019 4 Ker. 531], and on a consequential reference order dated 1st February, 2022 passed by the Division Bench.
2. The basic question involved in all these writ petitions is, whether a person, who purchased a bit of paddy land after the commencement of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (hereinafter called 'the Act, 2008), is entitled to prefer an application under Section 5(3)(i) r/w Section 9 of Act, 2008 for permission to reclaim the same, for construction of a residential building.
3. In fact, the said question was answered in the negative by a learned single Judge of this Court in Thankachan v. District Collector [2017 (3) KLT 35], which was followed by a learned single Judge in Yousuf Chalil v. State of Kerala [2019 (
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.