IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
XXXXXXXXXX & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Registrar of Births and Deaths Pathanamthitta Municipality Central Junction & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 4262 of 2022
Decided On : 19-07-2022
Constitution of India, Deletion of name of father from Passport – Single mother - Children of unwed mothers and the children of raped victim – Fundamental rights of privacy, liberty, and dignity - to expunge and remove the father's name from the birth register maintained by the office of the 1st respondent with respect to the 1st petitioner and issue a certificate showing the mother's name only as a single parent - woman's reproductive choice is a fundamental right and compassed the same under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court :
Woman's reproductive choice is a fundamental right and compassed the same under Article 21 of the Constitution of India- right of privacy, dignity and liberty cannot be curtailed by any authority. The mental agony of such person is to be imagined by every citizen of this country while intruding into their privacy. In some cases it will be a deliberate act and in other cases it may be by mistake. But the State should protect citizens of all such kind as equal to other citizens without disclosing their identity and privacy. Otherwise, they will face unimaginable mental agonies.
Result : Petition allowed
JUDGMENT :
This is a sad story of a mother and her son. The 2nd petitioner is an unfortunate mother who conceived the 1st petitioner while she was a minor under a mysterious circumstance by an unidentified person. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners to expunge and remove the father's name from the birth register maintained by the office of the 1st respondent with respect to the 1st petitioner and issue a certificate showing the mother's name only as a single parent. A child of an unwed mother is also a citizen of our country, and nobody can infringe any of his/her fundamental rights, which are guaranteed in our Constitution. He/she is a son/daughter of not only the unwed mother but this great country "India." We need to live in a country where there will be no example to cite for the word "bastard" and let that word continue in the dictionary pages without getting an opportunity to give examples to the young student generation of English. The children of unwed mothers and the children of raped victim can also live in this country with the fundamental rights of privacy, liberty, and dignity. None can intrude into their personal life, and if it happens, the constitutional Court of this country will protect their fundamental rights. The Apex Court has held that a woman's reproductive choice is a fundamental right and compassed the same under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In Suchita Srivastava and Another v. Chandigarh Administration [AIR 2010 SC 235], the Apex Court held thus :
2. Referring to the above judgment, the Apex Court in Devika Biswas v. Union of India and Others [AIR 2016 SC 4405] observed thus :
3. The Apex Court in K.S. Puttuswamy v. Union of India [2017 (4) KLT 1], observed like this :
4. In the light of the above decisions, the facts of the present case are to be considered. To keep the anonymity of the son and the mother, who are the petitioners in this writ petition, the 1st petitioner son is referred to as "X" and the 2nd petitioner mother is referred to as "Y". The name of the father of the 1st petitioner is given differently in three different documents, and therefore, the father's name is referred as "Z", "Z1" and "Z2".
5. The 1st petitioner was conceived by the 2nd petitioner, the mother of the 1st petitioner, while she was a minor under mysterious circumstance by an unidentified person. Therefore the father's name of the 1st petitioner happened to be recorded differently in different documents. The name of
Suchita Srivastava and Another v. Chandigarh Administration
Devika Biswas v. Union of India and Others
Deletion of name of father from passport – Name of single mother - Fundamental rights of privacy, liberty, and dignity
Constitutional courts can exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 to order corrections in birth registers to reflect a child's true parentage, prioritizing the child's fundamental right....
Interpretation of the Constitution cannot be frozen by its original understanding that it must evolve with the felt necessities of time, to meet the aspirations and challenges of the present and futu....
Legal provisions dictate that corrections to birth certificates require evidence of error; disputes regarding paternity must be adjudicated rather than amended administratively, but courts can interv....
Correction of entry in Register of Births – Registrar should be convinced that grounds mentioned in Section 15 of Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of Rules, 1999 are available.
The main legal point established is that the Registrar has the authority to correct birth entries under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and compliance with adoption provisions for re....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.