M. R. ANITHA
Sundar Lal S/o. K. K. Vasu – Appellant
Versus
Madhusoodanan S/o. Parthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.83/2011 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Alappuzha.
2. The appellant is the first defendant. The suit was one for specific performance of contract. (Parties would hereinafter be referred as per their status before the trial court).
3. Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant for the purchase of plaint schedule property for a total sale consideration of Rs.13 lakhs on 20.09.2010. On the date of agreement Rs.1,50,000/-was paid as advance sale consideration and the time of six months was stipulated for execution of the agreement. On 01.10.2010, Rs.6,50,000/-was further paid by the plaintiff towards part of sale consideration. On the next day, i.e. on 02.10.2010 first defendant shifted his residence from the property and plaintiff was put in possession and thereafter plaintiff and family have been residing in the plaint schedule property. Plaintiff invested a sum of Rs.1,50,000/-for maintenance of the house. Plaintiff repeatedly demanded the defendant to execute the agreement and he has been ready to perform his part of the contract always by paying the balance sale consideratio
Kasturi v. Iyyamperumal & Ors.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia v. Kiran Kant Robinson & Ors.
Sundara Iyer Sthanunatha Iyer v. Anantharaman Pillai Chidambaram Pillai
Pankaja & Anr. v. Yellappa (Dead) By LRs & Ors.
T.N. Alloy Foundry Co. Ltd. v. T.N. Electricity Board & Ors.
Alkapuri Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. Jayantibhai Naginbhai.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.