JUDGMENT :

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

1. In W.P. (C) No. 36700 of 2022, the petitioner is in title and possession of 0.1011 hectares of land obtained as per Ext P1 settlement deed. Even though the property was lying as dry land, the same was erroneously included in Ext.P2 data bank. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred Ext P4 application under Form 5 before the 6th respondent.

2. In W.P. (C) No. 36705 of 2022, the petitioner is in title and possession of 0.0670 hectares of land obtained as per Ext P1 settlement deed. Even though the property was lying as dry land, the same was erroneously included in Ext.P2 data bank. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred Ext P4 application under Form 5 before the 6th respondent.

3. Aggrieved by non-consideration of Ext P4 applications, petitioners have approached this Court filing W.P. (C) Nos.12518 and 12707 of 2022, which were disposed of as per Ext.P6 common judgment dated 20.06.2022 directing the 2nd respondent to take a decision on the applications. The said applications submitted by the petitioners have been rejected as per Ext.P11 order produced in both the writ petitions. Petitioners in both the cases have a specific contention that