IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KUNJUMUHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (DM) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i “To issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P8 order and quash the original of the same ii. To issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P7 report and quash the original of the same iii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 1st respondent/authority concerned to issue an order excluding the petitioner’s property from the data bank within a time frame fixed by the Hon’ble Court iv. Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents v. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. “ [sic]
2. The petitioner filed a Form-5 application in accordance to Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules . The same was rejected as per Ext.P4. The petitioner challenged the same before this Court by filing W.P.(C.) No. 25550/2023. This Court set aside Ext.P4 order and directed to reconsider Form-5 application as per Ext.P5 judgment. Thereafter, Ext.P8 ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.