K. BABU
Joseph Thomas, S/o Thomas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
The prayer in this Crl.M.C. is as follows:
2. The petitioner is accused No.1 in Crime No.262/2023 of Maradu Police Station registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 451, 354, 323, 509 & 34 of IPC.
3. On 23.02.2023, the petitioner surrendered before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-VIII, Ernakulam, the Jurisdictional Court. He submitted a bail application along with a surrender memo. The bail application was numbered as Crl.M.P. No.862/2023. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, the learned Magistrate refused permission to surrender before the Court. The learned Magistrate declined to consider the bail application moved by the petitioner, holding that the petitioner was not permitted to be in the custody of the Court. The learned Magistrate orally directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO concerned.
4. The course adopted by the learned Ma
Adri Dharan Das v. State of West Bengal (2005) 4 SCC 303
Devendra Singh Negi v. State of U.P. and Others 1994 CrLJ 1783 = 1993 SCC OnLine All 90
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Maharjan and Another (1994) 3 SCC 440
Niranjan Singh and Another v. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote and Ors. (1980) 2 SCC 559
Nirmal Jeet Kaur v. State of M.P. and Anr. (2004) 7 SCC 558
Sunita Devi v. State of Bihar (2005) 1 SCC 608
Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (AIR 2014 SC 1745)
Meaning of ‘custody’ is that law has taken control of a person accused of an offence or suspected of commission of an offence.
Remand of accused – Surrender petitions filed by accused who have voluntarily surrendered before a Magistrate having no jurisdiction to try the case, are not maintainable – No order of remand can be ....
Voluntary surrender before a Magistrate lacking jurisdiction is not maintainable under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C, requiring police custody to process remand.
Bail applications of surrendering accused should be heard and decided on merits on the day of surrender.
The Court directed that bail applications must be considered expeditiously upon the petitioner's surrender, highlighting procedural compliance and urgency in judicial processes.
Court directs expeditious consideration of NBW recall and bail upon accused's surrender after bond cancellation.
The court permits a petitioner to surrender and presents a framework for bail considering reasonable non-appearance grounds.
Court mandated that bail applications must be considered promptly upon surrendering, ensuring a fair legal process.
The Court allows the accused to surrender and mandates a fair hearing on bail applications under the Cr.P.C, emphasizing legal protections for defendants.
The High Court may issue directions to the Trial Court to consider and dispose of bail and non-bailable warrant recall applications on the very same day of the accused's surrender to prevent unnecess....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.