Back
N. NAGARESH
Varghese Vijesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By the Principal Secretary to Government, Water Resources Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The petitioners in these writ petitions are working as Operators in the Kerala Water Authority. The writ petitions have been filed seeking to direct the State of Kerala to finalise the Draft Technical Service Rules for the Kerala Water Authority and to include the category of Operators also in PSC Notifications for recruitment to the posts of Assistant Engineers.
2. For convenience, the parties and exhibits are referred to in this judgment as they are arrayed and marked in W.P.(C) No.30716/2019.
3. The petitioners state that they have been working as Operators in the Kerala Water Authority (KWA). They have B.Tech qualifications. By Ext.P1 notification dated 31.12.2012, the Kerala Public Service Commission invited applications for recruitment to the post of Assistant Engineer in the KWA. LDCs with six year experience and First and Second Grade Overseers with two years experience were made eligible to apply for the post under the 10% in-service quota. The petitioners rue that the 2nd respondent-KWA has omitted to include the category of Operators in Ext.P1 notification along with LDCs and Overseers. The PSC examination and selections is over.
4. The petitioners submitted repre
When subsequent Rules come and there is no provision in said Rules to enable any employee to be considered as per old Rules, matter must end there.
The main legal principle established is that the appointment method and eligibility criteria as per the existing rules at the time of notification should be adhered to, and vacancies should be filled....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that individuals appointed under the diploma quota cannot switch to the degree quota for further promotion, as determined by the interpretation of ....
(1) Promotion – Once a person joins as an Assistant Engineer, i.e. feeder post under a separate service governed by Special Rules, 1960, then that person irrespective of how he/she has been appointed....
Transfer within services does not relinquish rights to promotion in the parent service if the branch remains part of the main service.
Statutory bodies must follow definitive recruitment procedures to ascertain the absence of qualified candidates before bypassing direct recruitment lists. Repeated notifications without evidence of q....
The court affirmed that qualifications for public service positions must be strictly adhered to, emphasizing that equivalence pertains to the institution, not the qualification itself.
Promotion criteria under the Kerala High Court Service Rules must be reconsidered in light of amendments and existing qualifications of the petitioner.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the promotion rules did not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India as the different cadres were not treated as equals, having....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
