IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J.
Elsamma, W/o. Joy - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor - Respondent
OP(Crl.) No. 334 of 2023
Decided On : 30-05-2023
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section 99, (1), (2), 14(5)(e) - Criminal Rules of Practice - Rules 72, 73, 382, 383 and 384 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules, 2016 - Rule 77, 222 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 20 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 74 - Juvenile Justice Board - Seeking a copy of 'B' diary - Direct Juvenile Justice Board to issue copy of 'B' diary mentioned in Ext.P1 application within a time frame to be fixed by Hon'ble Court - Petitioner applied for getting a certified copy of 'B' Diary, which is not required to be maintained as per Criminal Rules of Practice - Para 24.
Finding of the Court :
Amicus Curiae submitted that there may be a situation where proceedings paper may contain a confidential report relating to child, and in such cases, Juvenile Justice Board cannot issue copies of such proceedings - Petitioner applied for getting a certified copy of 'B' Diary, which is not required to be maintained as per Criminal Rules of Practice - Juvenile Justice Board maintains Proceedings Paper furnishing therein judicial steps taken in case - Therefore, if petitioner makes an application for getting Proceedings Paper as per Rule 222 of Criminal Rules of Practice, Juvenile Justice Board shall issue same, subject to restrictions contained in Section 99 of Act - Right of victim, as provided in Sub-section (2) of Section 99 of Act, is only subject to restrictions contained in Sub-section (1) of Section 99 of Act - Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that application seeking certified copy of 'B' diary had already been rejected - Petitioner makes an application seeking certified copy of Proceedings Paper, Juvenile Justice Board shall consider same in accordance with law.
Result : Petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
The prayers in this Original Petition (Crl.) are as follows :
(ii) Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. The petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.1938/2017 of Thodupuzha Police Station. The above crime was registered against six persons. One among them is a Child in Conflict with Law.
3. The proceedings against the Child in Conflict with Law are pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Thodupuzha.
4. The defacto complainant filed an application before the Juvenile Justice Board, Thodupuzha seeking a copy of the 'B' diary in J.S.T.No.33/2018, which arose from the above said crime. It is submitted that the Juvenile Justice Board declined to grant the copy of the 'B' diary. Therefore, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Juvenile Justice Board to issue a copy of the 'B' diary in J.S.T No.33/2018.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. Nireesh Mathew, the learned Public Prosecutor Sri. G. Sudheer and the learned Amicus Curiae Sri. John S. Ralph.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Juvenile Justice Board is bound to issue a copy of the 'B' diary.
7. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the proceedings before the Juvenile Justice Board may contain the reports relating to the child, the confidentiality of which is to be maintained under Section 99 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short 'the Act'), and therefore, the prayer of the petitioner cannot be allowed.
8. The learned Amicus Curiae brought to my attention the various provisions in the Criminal Rules of Practice and the Civil Rules of Practice and submitted that in criminal Courts, there is no practice of maintaining 'B' diary, and what is available is the 'Proceedings Paper' as contained in Rule 73 of the Criminal Rules of Practice and 'A' diary register as provided in Rule 72 of the Rules. The learned Amicus Curiae also submitted that 'B' diary is maintained only in Civil Courts as provided in Rule 383 of the Civil Rules of Practice. The learned Amicus Curiae further submitted that Rule 384 of the Civil Rules of Practice is a corresponding provision to Rule 73 of the Criminal Rules of Practice.
9. Rules 72 and 73 of the Criminal Rules of Practice are extracted below :
(2) Every Court shall maintain a hearing book in Administrative Form No.11.
73. Proceedings Paper-(1) Every Judge or Magistrate shall maintain a proceedings paper on judicial Form No.61 furnishing therein full information as to the several judicial steps taken in the case such as reasons for adjournments, issue of warrants to the accused or witnesses, marking of documents, examination of witnesses, framing of charges, questioning of the accused, hearing arguments and pronouncing judgment or order. The entries shall be neatly written by the judge or Magistrate and initialled by him in open Court.
(2) When records are sent up to a Court of appeal or revision or forwarded to a Court to which the case is transferred or committed, a typed or neatly written copy of the proceedings paper shall be placed with the records."
10. Rules 382, 383 and 384 of Civil Rules of Practice are extracted below :
383. B Diary-For showing the dates and the nature o
Point of Law : Rule 73 of Rules deals with Proceedings Paper.
The court cannot impose procedural requirements not specified in existing laws, emphasizing the separation of judicial and legislative functions.
Juveniles acquitted of crimes have a right to have their records erased, promoting rehabilitation and preventing stigma as per the Juvenile Justice Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the determination of the accused's juvenile status at the time of the alleged offence and the subsequent transfer of the case to the Juvenile Ju....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the Juvenile Justice Board to independently apply its mind, follow prescribed procedures, and ensure procedural safeguards f....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to consider the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, particularly Section 15 and 18, in bail applications for children in conflic....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail for a juvenile in conflict with law is a rule under the Act of 2015, and denial of bail is an exception that must be justified based on s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the preliminary assessment under section 15 of the Juvenile Justice Act, to be completed within the specified time frame as....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of summoning the General Diary in specific circumstances to establish the timing and nature of FIR registrations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.