ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. AJITHKUMAR
Ashok Harry Pothen, S/o Harry Pothen – Appellant
Versus
Premlal, Late K. A. Krishnan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.G. Ajithkumar, J.
The respondent-tenant in R.C.P.No.35 of 2022 on the file of the Rent Control Court (Additional Munsiff), Thiruvananthapuram, has filed this Original Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. He is aggrieved of Ext.P7 order of the Rent Control Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in that rent control petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. R.C.P.No.35 of 2022 was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The respondent contended that the petition schedule premises was let out to the petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs.1,65,000/-as per a lease agreement dated 15.07.2015. There was stipulation for yearly enhancement of rent by 10%.
The respondent filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 alleging that the petitioner defaulted payment of rent and as on February, 2022, an amount of Rs.1,32,69,902/-remained to be paid towards arrears of rent. It is further averred by the respondents that although an agreement for sale of the petition schedule building was entered into between the partie
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N. Kapoor -AIR 1959 SC 1262
B.M.Lall v. M/s Dunlop Rubber Co. (India) Ltd. & another AIR 1968 SC 175
Corporation of Calicut v. K.Sreenivasan AIR 2002 SC 2051
Corporation of Calicut v. K Sreenivasan (2002) 5 SCC 361
C.M.Beena v. P.N.Ramachandra Rao (2004) 3 SCC 595
Sunny Padamadan Rafael @ Sunny Padamadan v. Vijaya Shenony 2019 (2) KHC 90
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.