A. BADHARUDEEN
C. D. Varghese – Appellant
Versus
Joseph Mani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.S.A.No.895 of 2020 has been filed under Order XLII Rule 1 read with Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the decree and judgment in A.S.No.153/2016 dated 10.11.2020 on the files of District Court, Kottayam arose out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.520/2014 dated 10.06.2016 on the files of the Munsiff Court, Kottayam. The appellant herein is Sri C.D.Varghese, the 2nd plaintiff in O.S.No.520/2014.
2. The respondents are the sole defendant as well as the 1st plaintiff.
3. Sri C.D.Varghese, who is the 2nd defendant in O.S.No.565/2014, has filed R.S.A.No.835/2020 challenging the decree and judgment in A.S.No.154/2016 dated 10.11.2020 on the files of District Court, Kottayam arose out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.565/2014 dated 10.06.2016 on the files of the Munsiff Court, Kottayam.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/C.D.Varghese as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent/Joseph Mani.
5. I shall refer the parties in this appeal as ‘C.D.Varghese & another.’ and ‘Joseph Mani’ hereafter for convenience.
6. Perused the judgments under challenge, the documents and precedents placed by the learned counsel for C.D Varghese
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N.Kapoor
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N.Kapoor
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N.Kapoor’s,
Central Bank of India and another v. Beena Thiruvenkitam
Corporation of Calicut v. K.Sreenivas
Delta International Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Ganeriwalla & anr.
Guruashish Constructions (P) Ltd. (Resolution Professional) v. MHADA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.