SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 37

ALKA SARIN
Rupinder Kumar Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Balian Trading Company – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jatin Bansal Adv., Mr. Amrik Singh Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J.

Present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11.03.2024 issuing conditional warrants of arrest of the petitioner.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-respondent No.1 herein filed a suit for recovery, which was decreed for Rs.6,89,195.34 paisa vide judgment and decree dated 12.04.2022. Subsequently, an execution petition was filed for recovery of Rs.9,12,954/-. In the said execution petition an application was filed under Order XXI Rule 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and on 20.02.2024 the Court granted the judgment-debtor one opportunity to follow the provisions contained in Order XXI Rule 37 and 40 CPC in true letter and spirit. The Court further adjourned the matter for producing necessary evidence by both the decree-holder and judgment-debtor to the effect that Order XXI Rule 37 CPC was the only mode to satisfy the decree. Pursuant to that, an affidavit was filed by the petitioner herein stating that he only owns 02 Biswas of land, which was attached in some other proceedings, and that he did not have any other property or cash or bank balance to satisfy the decree. Subsequently, the impugne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top