KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Navaneeth Krishnan – Respondent
ORDER :
An important question relating to the authority of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (for short, 'VACB') of the State to register the crime and investigate the offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'the P.C.Act') committed by the employees of the Central Government arises for consideration in these Criminal Revision Petitions.
2. The VACB, Kottayam unit registered a crime as V.C.No.5/2010/KTM against four accused persons. After completing the investigation, they filed final report at the court of Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kottayam (for short, 'the court below') alleging offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(c) and (d) r/w 13(2) of the P.C.Act and Sections 120-B, 420, 468, 471 and 204 of the IPC.
3. The prosecution allegation in short is as follows :
The accused No.1 is the Village Extension Officer, Thalayolaparamba and the Implementing Officer of Project No.137/2006 of Thalayolaparamba Grama Panchayat. Accused Nos. 2 to 4 are the officials of North Malabar Gramin Bank, Thalayolaparamba Branch. The accused Nos. 1 to 4 conspired together with the intention to cheat Thalayolaparamba Grama Panchayath and the beneficiaries of the proj
H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi (AIR 1955 SC 196)
Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. And Others 2013 (4) KHC 552
National Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Pranay Sethi & Others (2017) 16 SCC 680
Santhosh T.A. And Another v. State of Kerala 2017 (5) KHC 107
Vijayan Kottari v. State of Kerala (2016(3) KHC 749)
Union of India v. Prakash P. Hinduja and Another (AIR 2003 SC 2612)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.