N. NAGARESH
Punnoose George S/o George – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector, Kottayam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. NAGARESH, J.
1. The petitioners in all these writ petitions hold property in Nattakom Village in Kottayam Taluk of Kottayam District. The petitioners submitted Ext.P3 applications to the Revenue Divisional Officer for permission to use their land for non-agricultural purposes. Such applications were filed invoking Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967.
2. The petitioners state that considering Ext.P3 applications, the Revenue Divisional Officer has now passed Ext.P2 orders granting permission to the petitioners to use the land for non-agricultural purposes.
3. As the petitioners had to change the nature of the land in Revenue Record in the light of the KLU orders, the petitioners submitted applications invoking the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 seeking to revise the rate of basic tax of the land and to make necessary additions in the Basic Tax Register and other Revenue Records.
4. The petitioners state that acting upon such Form-A applications, the Tahsildar has now issued Ext.P4 communications stating that the petitioners have to comply with the provisions of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.