AMIT RAWAL, C. S. SUDHA
Shiji D/o Vanajakumary – Appellant
Versus
Project Director N. H. Authority of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMIT RAWAL, J.
1. Present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25.2.2021 rendered in O.P. (Arb) No. 526/2018 of Additional District Court-III, Thiruvananthapuram, whereby the Award bearing No. 55 of 2015 in LAC No. 535 of 2013 of the Arbitrator dated 30.1.2018 enhancing the compensation awarded by the competent authority, has been set aside.
2. The facts in brief for adjudication of the controversy involved in the present case, are as under:
3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of Government of India on 7.3.2013. Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, National Highway, Th
Golden Iron and Steel Forging vs. Union of India
Navayuga Engineering Company Ltd. vs. Union of India
Narain Das Jain vs. Agra Nagar Mahapalika
Sarjuprasad and Others vs. National Highways Authority of India and Others
Section 37 court can rectify arbitral award's omission of 30% solatium in post-cut-off highway acquisitions as computational error when raised before tribunal, limited to arithmetic addition without ....
Acquisition of Land - Arbitrator granted enhancement of compensation - Arbitrator while rendering Award correctly took into consideration entire material on record, while determining rate at which co....
The court upheld the applicability of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 to compensation determinations under the National Highways Act, affirming the Arbitrator's decision to enhance compensation based on resid....
Acquisition of land – Constitutional guarantee of just compensation cannot be rendered contingent upon magnitude of financial burden – Mere escalation in projected liability, howsoever significant, d....
The Supreme Court ruled Section 3-J of the National Highways Act unconstitutional, affirming landowners' right to solatium and interest, recognizing it as a constitutional obligation of the State.
Sections denying solatium and interest to landholders under the National Highways Act are unconstitutional; landowners are entitled to these benefits as per recent Supreme Court ruling.
The more beneficial provision of Section 80 of the Act, 2013 relating to interest would apply to acquisitions made under the NH Act, and the court directed the respondents to pay the calculated inter....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.