IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
The Kerala High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Electricity Consumers' Association, Represented by its General Secretary, Pradeep M. & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Represented by its Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 19205 of 2023
Decided On : 07-09-2023
Electricity Act 2003 - Section 61, 62, 131, 181 (3) - Electricity (Procedure for Previous Publication) Rules, 2005 - Tariff regulations - Frame voltage wise cost of supply - Fix electricity tariff - To declare that Ext. P21 (d) Tariff Regulation framed by Regulatory Commission is illegal, ultra vires and to quash same by a writ of certiorari - Ext. P21(d) final tariff regulations to does not conform to requirement of Section 181 (3) of Electricity Act, 2003 - Para 23.
Finding of the Court :
When changes are made to draft regulations which are not incidental or ancillary to draft regulations, but foreign to draft, such changes should be notified/published for information of persons likely to be affected and inviting their objections and suggestions thereto - Ext. P21(d) final tariff regulations notified repayment of principal amount on Master Trust Bonds to be charged on to ARR without calling for any objection or suggestion of persons likely to be affected - Ext. P21(d) final tariff regulations to aforesaid extent does not conform to requirement of Section 181 (3) of Electricity Act, 2003 and Electricity (Procedure for Previous Publication) Rules, 2005 - Regulation 34 (iv) of Ext. P21(d) final Tariff Regulations to extent it differs from Regulation 34 (iv) of Ext. P21(c) draft Tariff Regulations is declared as illegal and is, set aside - It will be open to Regulatory Commission to specify terms and conditions for determination of tariff as regards repayment of principal amount on Master Trust Bonds - After complying with requirement of Section 181 (3) of Electricity Act, 2003 and Electricity (Procedure for Previous Publication) Rules, 2005 and in accordance with law.
Result : Writ petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
The 1st petitioner, a registered Association of Industries, primarily of High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Consumers of Electricity in the State, has approached this Court along with one of its member industry and the Managing Director of the said member industry to (i) direct the 1st respondent, Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 'Regulatory Commission') to comply with the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003, in particular Sections 61, [Section 61 - Tariff regulations
The Appropriate Commission shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, specify the terms and conditions for the determination of tariff, and in doing so, shall be guided by the following, namely:--
(a) the principles and methodologies specified by the Central Commission for determination of the tariff applicable to generating companies and transmission licensees;
(b) the generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity are conducted on commercial principles;
(c) the factors which would encourage competition, efficiency, economical use of the resources, good performance and optimum investments;
(d) safeguarding of consumers' interest and at the same time, recovery of the cost of electricity in a reasonable manner;
(e) the principles rewarding efficiency in performance;
(f) multiyear tariff principles;
[(g) that the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity and also reduces cross-subsidies in the manner specified by the Appropriate Commission;]
(h) the promotion of co-generation and generation of electricity from renewable sources of energy;
(i) the National Electricity Policy and tariff policy:
PROVIDED that the terms and conditions for determination of tariff under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, and the enactments specified in the Schedule as they stood immediately before the appointed date, shall continue to apply for a period of one year or until the terms and conditions for tariff are specified under this section, whichever is earlier.] and 62, [Section 62 - Determination of tariff
(1) The Appropriate Commission shall determine the tariff in accordance with the provisions of this Act for--
(a) supply of electricity by a generating company to a distribution licensee:
PROVIDED that the Appropriate Commission may, in case of shortage of supply of electricity, fix the minimum and maximum ceiling of tariff for sale or purchase of electricity in pursuance of an agreement, entered into between a generating company and a licensee or between licensees, for a period not exceeding one year to ensure reasonable prices of electricity;
(b) transmission of electricity;
(c) wheeling of electricity;
(d) retail sale of electricity:
PROVIDED that in case of distribution of electricity in the same area by two or more distribution licensees, the Appropriate Commission may, for the promoting competition among distribution licensees, fix only maximum ceiling of tariff for retail sale of electricity.
(2) The Appropriate Commission may require a licensee or a generating company to furnish separate details, as may be specified in respect of generation, transmission and distribution for determination of tariff.
(3) The Appropriate Commission shall not, while determining the tariff under this Act, show undue preference to any consumer of electricity but may differentiate according to the consumer's load factor, power factor, voltage, total consumption of electricity during any specified period or the time at which the supply is required or the geographical position of any area, the nature of supply and the purpose for which the supply is required.
(4) No tariff or part of any tariff may ordinarily be amended, more frequently than once in any financial year, except in respect of any changes expressly permitted under the terms of any fuel surcharge formula as may be specified.
(5) The Commission may require a licensee or a generating company to com
Avinash Ramakrishna Kashiwar v. State of Maharashtra
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India
PTC India Ltd v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, thr. Secy.
Reliance Infrastructure Limited v. State of Maharashtra and others
Ninan K.C. v. Kerala State Electricity Board
JK Industries Ltd. v. Union of India
Association of Residents of Mhow (ROM) and another v. Delimitation Commission of India
Association of Industrial Electricity Users v State of Andhra Pradesh
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. v Sai Renewable Power Pvt. Ltd.
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
Point of law: Commission cannot be kept in the dark when the effect is amendment to the PPA.
The Ombudsman erred in failing to recognize the commercial relationship between the parties, which affected the determination of electricity tariff under the Electricity Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.