Back
PARTHA SARATHI SEN
DPSC Ltd – Appellant
Versus
E. C. L – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Partha Sarathi Sen, J.
1. In this writ petition the writ petitioners have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ or writs for cancellation and/or revoking and/or rescinding the order dated 19.12.2011 as passed in GR Case no.DPSC-1 K of 2011 by the Ombudsman, West Bengal.
2. For effective adjudication of the instant lis the facts leading to filing of the instant writ petition are required to be discussed in a nut shell.
ii. Post execution of the said MOU a dispute arose between the writ petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.1 with regard to the t
The Ombudsman erred in failing to recognize the commercial relationship between the parties, which affected the determination of electricity tariff under the Electricity Act.
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
Tariff determination for hydro projects with enhanced capacity, binding nature of prior PPAs on successors, and writ jurisdiction limited; exclusive domain of regulatory commission, not courts, to fi....
Point of law: Commission cannot be kept in the dark when the effect is amendment to the PPA.
Writ petitions under Article 226 against electricity regulatory commission orders fixing O&M charges not maintainable due to efficacious statutory appeal remedy under Section 111 of Electricity Act, ....
Point of law: Electricity - Disputed factual aspects cannot be and should not be gone into in the extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Section 226 of the Constitution of India. We are therefore of t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
