SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 709

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J.
Johnson Stephen – Appellant
Versus
Chinchumol – Respondent
Crl.MC No. 1896 of 2023
Decided on : 25-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : PRABHU K.N., MANUMON A.
For the Respondent: G SUDHEER GP,,KK DHEERENDRA KRISNAN AMICUS CURIAE

Point of Law: It is trite that composition is a unilateral act. A joint application by accused and victim is not a requirement of Section 320.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406 and 420 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 320, (2), (8), 161 - Quash final report - Criminal breach of trust – Offence of cheating - Accused seeks to quash final report and all further proceedings – Petitioner has failed to place any sufficient material to quash proceedings. (Para 25)

Finding of the Court :

(CW1) received amount mentioned in Annexure-A2 - Circumstances under which she resiled from composition of offences have not been placed before Court - Learned Public Prosecutor placed a report submitted by Investigating Officer stating that complainant informed that a sum more is due to her from petitioner/accused - Charge witness No.2 had mentioned in his statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. that a sum is due to him from petitioner/accused in connection with alleged transactions leading to registration of crime - Petitioner has failed to place any sufficient material to quash proceedings in C.C. on file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class – Court find no reason to interfere with impugned order.

Result: Crl.M.C. is disposed of

ORDER :

The accused in C.C.No.755 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court-I, Perumbavoor seeks to quash the final report and all further proceedings.

2. The petitioner faces charges under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC. The prosecution case is that the petitioner, on a false promise to arrange a job visa to Australia, collected Rs.6,10,000/-from respondent No.1, the de facto complainant. It is alleged that the petitioner obtained wrongful gain, causing wrongful loss to the victim.

3. The petitioner pleaded the following:-

Based on the first information given by the victim, Perumbavoor Police registered Crime No.967/2022. During the stage of investigation, the petitioner and the victim settled their disputes. The victim submitted a petition seeking composition of the offences along with an application seeking leave of the Court to permit her to compound the offences. The victim filed a statement before the Investigating Officer that she had settled the dispute and did not intend to prosecute the offence. The learned Magistrate sought a report from the Investigating Officer. As per Annexure-A5 dated 31.10.2022, the Investigating Officer informed the learned Magistrate that the victim received Rs.1,75,000/-as a full and final settlement.

4. The victim later submitted before the learned Magistrate that she was not pressing the application seeking composition, and the learned Magistrate dismissed the application as not pressed.

5. Notice was served on the victim. She did not turn up.

6. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned Amicus Curiae.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an application seeking composition under Section 320 Cr.P.C., having been filed by the victim, cannot be withdrawn for the reason that the moment it is filed, it shall have the force of acquittal.

8. The learned Public Prosecutor, per contra, contended that the filing of the application seeking composition should have the force of acquittal at the moment it is filed only in the case of offences compoundable without the leave of the Court and in case of offences where leave of the Court is required, only after granting of leave, a judicial act of deciding whether, in the interest of justice, the parties should be allowed to compound, it shall have the force of acquittal.

9. The learned Amicus curiae Shri. K.K. Dheerendrakrishnan, relying on the decision in N.Raja Malla Reddy v. State of A.P. and Another [2005 KHC 2083], submitted that a petition seeking composition of the offence cannot be withdrawn in as much as it has the immediate effect of acquittal of the accused. The learned Amicus Curiae further submitted that unilateral withdrawal of consent by one party, especially after the other party performed his part of the terms in the agreement, cannot be permitted. The learned Amicus Curiae submitted that the Court ought not to have permitted the victim to withdraw the application seeking composition.

10. It is profitable to extract Section 320 of the Cr.P.C..

    320.Compounding of offences.-(1) The offences punishable under the sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) specified in the first two columns of the Table next following may be compounded by the persons mentioned in the third column of that Table:

Offence Section of the Indian Penal Code applicable Person by whom offence may be compounded

1 2 3

XXXX

    2. The offences punishable under the sections of the Indian Penal Code,1860, (45 of 1860) specified in the first two columns of the Table next following may, with the permission of the Court before which any prosecution for such offence is pending, be compounded by the persons mentioned in the third column of that Table:

Offence Section of the Indian Penal Code applicable Person by whom offence may be compounded

1 2 3

xxxxx

    3. When an offence is compoundable under this section, the abetment of such offence or an attempt to commit such offence (when such attempt is

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top