R.C.KHULBE
Aman Kumar Goel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Khulbe, J. - By means of this writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to quash the impugned FIR bearing No.28 of 2021 registered under Sections 383, 465, 420, 504, 120-B IPC at P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar.
2. The parties have filed the above-numbered compounding application to show that they have buried their differences and have settled their disputes amicably. The aggrieved Vaibhav Bansal and the petitioner-Aman Kumar Goel are present before the Court today being duly identified by their respective counsel. They are fairly submitted that the compromise has taken place between them; the aggrieved Vaibhav Bansal fairly submitted that an affidavit is also submitted by his wife, who is serving at present Hyderabad; they did not want to pursue the matter because simply it was purely a business dispute between them regarding sale and purchase of gold.
3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the compounding application.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the writ petitioner that the offences punishable under Sections 420, 504 IPC are compoundable whereas offences under Sections 383, 465 and 120-B IPC are non-co
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Dimpey Gujral and ors. vs. Union Territory Through Administrator, U.T. Chandigarh and ors."
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia & Ors. v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre & Ors., (1988) 1 SCC 692
Nikhil Merchant v. CBI and another"
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and ors. vs. State of Gujarat and anr."
Pepsi Food Ltd. & Anr. v. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors., (1998) 5 SCC 749
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.