P. G. AJITHKUMAR
M. Mohammed Kunhi S/o Hassankunhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Sri. U. Raghavan, son of Kannan, Kunnummel, a retired teacher expired on 28.08.2003. He had 22 cents of land comprised in resurvey No. 291/3-C of Balla Village. Sale Deed No. 359 of 2007 alienating the said property was executed on 05.07.2007 in the name of Sri. U. Raghavan. It was in favour of Smt. Gracy Jacob. Her husband is a witness in that document. Subsequently, the said property was alienated in favour of Sri. Muhammed Kunhi. He in turn executed sale deed No. 4673 of 2009 on 30.10.2009 alienating the said 22 cents of land in favour of Sri. V. Hashim. Alleging that Sri. Mohammed Kunhi, knowing fully that the property belonging to Sri. U. Raghavan was got transferred by forging a sale deed by impersonation, he had executed sale deed in favour of Sri. V. Hashim and received an amount of Rs. 22 lakhs. With the said allegations, Sri. V. Hashim filed a complaint before of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Hosdurg alleging offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The complaint was forwarded to the Hosdurg Police Station, which followed an investigation and filing of the
Anju Chaudhary vs. State of U.P. and Another
Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander and Another
Awadesh Kumar Jha Akilesh Kumar Jha vs. State of Bihar
Babubhai and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Mahesh Chand vs. B. Janardhan Reddy and Another
Mathews Mar Ivaniose vs. Dr. Thomas Mar Athanasious
P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala
Surender Kaushik and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.