P. B. SURESH KUMAR, JOHNSON JOHN
Thazheveettil Naushad, S/o. K. Aboobacker – Appellant
Versus
Elizabeth Reggive, W/o. Late Reggive Webster – Respondent
ORDER :
(Johnson John, J.)
The revision petitioners are the tenants, who suffered an order of eviction under Section 12(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (for short 'the Act') and subsequently evicted in E.P No.377 of 2022 on 16-10-2023. Against the order under Section 12(3) of the Rent Control Court, the petitioners filed an appeal as RCA No.23 of 2023 with a petition to condone the delay of 309 days in filing the appeal and the Appellate Court dismissed the petition to condone the delay for want of sufficient cause with an observation that the appeal and delay condonation petition filed at the fag end of the execution proceedings is only a dilatory strategy to drag the proceedings.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the revision petitioners argued that the landlords filed I.A No.4 of 2021 in RCP No.46 of 2021 seeking payment of admitted arrears of rent even before the tenants filed their objection to the RCP and a perusal of Section 12 of the Act would show that the contest in the RCP is a prerequisite to entertain an application under Section 12 of the Act. Learned
Compliance with the requirements of Section 12(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 is necessary to contest eviction.
Perpetual default in payment of rent is a valid ground for dissolution of marriage.
An order mandating tenants to deposit rent arrears under Section 12 of the Act is not appealable under Section 18.
Joint eviction petition by landlords permissible under law; High Court limited to examining legality without re-evaluation of evidence.
The court affirmed that a genuine need of the landlord under Section 11(3) justifies eviction despite tenant's claims of mala fides.
The tenant must substantiate claims of rent payment; an appeal under Section 18 from an order under Section 12(3) is maintainable.
The court emphasized the admissibility of documents, determination of arrears of rent, and the appellate authority's power to modify orders under the Act, highlighting the importance of complying wit....
Tenant obligations under rent control law enforce stringent compliance with payment of rent as a prerequisite for contesting eviction.
An application under Section 12(1) of the Rent Control Act is maintainable in an appeal against an order passed under Section 12(3), confirming tenant obligations for rent during eviction proceedings....
Eviction can be mandated under the provisions of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act if bona fide needs are established.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.