SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J.
State, The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Crime Branch – Petitioner
Versus
Babu Thomas and Ors. – Respondents
Crl.M.C. Nos.746 & 947 of 2020
Decided On : 15-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri.Grashious Kuriakose, Manu Tom, Sri.K.R.Jithin, Sri.Balu Tom
For the Respondent: Sri.Sojan Micheal, Sri Grachious Kuriakose, Addl. Director General Of Prosecution

The Magistrate has the power to commit a case to the Sessions Court if it ought to be tried by the Sessions Court, even if the case is not exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. Additionally, interconnected cases arising from the same incident should be tried by the same court to prevent conflicting judgments.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code - Commitment of Case to Sessions Court - Section 323 - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The State of Kerala filed a petition under Section 323 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to commit C.C.No.49/2014 to the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha, along with S.C.No.262/2010. The Magistrate dismissed the petition, leading to the filing of criminal miscellaneous cases by the State and the victim.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the Magistrate has the power to commit a case to the Sessions Court if it ought to be tried by the Sessions Court, even if the case is not exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. The Court also emphasized the need for both cases arising from the same incident to be tried by the same court to prevent conflicting judgments.

Issues: The main issue was whether C.C.No.49/2014 should be committed to the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha, invoking the powers under Section 323 Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Section 323 Cr.P.C. and emphasized the importance of trying interconnected cases arising from the same incident before the same court to prevent conflicting judgments.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous cases, set aside the order of the Magistrate, and directed the commitment of C.C.No.49/2014 to the Sessions Court. It also allowed the State to file a petition before the Sessions Judge to keep S.C.No.262/2010 in abeyance until C.C.No.49/2014 is committed to that Court.

ORDER :

These two Criminal Miscellaneous Cases are connected and therefore, I am disposing these cases by a common order. I will narrate the facts in Crl.M.C.No.746/2020 first.

2. Crl.M.C.No.746/2020 is filed by the State of Kerala challenging Annexure-4 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Devikulam. Annexure-4 is an order dated 19.09.2019 in C.M.P. No.1596/2019 in C.C.No.49/2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Devikulam. The above petition was filed by the State of Kerala through its Assistant Public Prosecutor before the learned Magistrate under Section 323 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, Cr.P.C.). The case of the petitioner is that C.C.No.49/2014 is a complaint filed by the Deputy Range Officer, Marayoor Forest Station, against the respondents in that petition, for the offences punishable under Sections 27(1) (e)(iii) and (iv) of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, alleging that the respondents committed theft of about 200 kgs of sandal wood from Marayoor Sandal Reserve Forest. Respondents 1 and 2 are no more. In connection with the death of the 1st respondent Babu Thomas in that petition, Crime No.147/2006 was registered by the Marayoor Police under Section 174 Cr.P.C. The above case was subsequently investigated by the District Crime Branch, Idukki, and submitted a final report alleging offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 109, 114, 348, 330, 218, 201, 120 B and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that on 23.11.2006, the forest officers, after arresting the 1st respondent Babu Thomas, physically assaulted him and due to the grave injuries sustained because of the physical torture, he died on the way to hospital. Based on the charge sheet, the case was committed to the Sessions Court and now the same is pending before the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha, as S.C.No.262/2010.

3. The forest case registered as C.C.No.49/2014 arising from OR No.15/2006 was filed by the Deputy Range Officer, Marayoor Forest Station, under Section 27(1)(e)(iii) and (iv) of the Kerala Forest Act. The learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the same and the case is now pending as C.C.No.49/2014, which is posted for pre-charge evidence. The deceased and CW2 to CW4 in S.C.No.262/2010 on the file of the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha are the accused in C.C.No.49/2014 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Devikulam. The witnesses namely CW11, CW20, CW21 and CW22 as well as the accused in S.C.No.262/2010 are the witnesses in C.C.No.49/2014 pending before the learned Magistrate. Therefore, according to the State, the witnesses to be examined and documents to be adduced in evidence in both these cases are connected. Therefore, for the proper decision of both the cases and in the interest of justice, it is inevitable to try S.C.No.262/2010 pending before the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha along with C.C.No.49/2014 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Devikulam is the submission. Hence the State filed an application under Section 323 Cr.P.C. before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Devikulam, to commit the case to the Sessions Court for trying along with S.C.No.262/2010 pending before the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha. The learned Magistrate dismissed the same as per Annexure-4 order. Aggrieved by the same, this criminal miscellaneous case is filed by the State. The same order is challenged in Crl.M.C.No.947/2020 by the victim, who is the father of the deceased in S.C.No.262/2010 on the file of the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha. Annexure-F in Crl.M.C.No.947/2020 is Annexure-4 in Crl.M.C.No.746/2020. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Magistrate in the petition under Section 323 Cr.P.C., these criminal miscellaneous cases are filed by the State and the victim.

4. Heard the Additional Director General of Prosecution, Sri.Gracious Kuriakose, Adv.Manu Tom Cheruvally appearing for the petitioner in Crl.M.C.No.947/202

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top