C. JAYACHANDRAN
Muhammedali, S/o. Saithutty – Appellant
Versus
Pathumma, W/o. Abdulkareem – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Petitioner herein is the plaintiff in the suit O.S.No.47/2008, originally filed before the Munsiff Court, Ponnani, and subsequently transferred to the Sub Court, Tirur, based on pecuniary jurisdiction and re-numbered as O.S.No.20/2014. Petitioner herein is aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of the learned Sub Judge, wherein the prayer of the petitioner/plaintiff to treat an amended relief as ancillary to the main relief sought for in the plaint – for the purpose of court fee -is rejected. The suit, as filed originally was one for fixation of boundary between plaint A and B schedule properties and also for injunction. Pendende lite, the plaint was amended and a relief for recovery of possession as well -in case any extent of land which belongs to the plaintiff is found to be in the possession of the defendants – was incorporated. For the purpose of court fee, the plaintiff/petitioner seeks to treat the amended relief for recovery of possession, as ancillary to the main relief for fixation of boundary and relied upon the Proviso to Section 6 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act (herein after referred to as 'the Act'). This contention is seen rejected by the impugned Ext.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.