Back
EASWARAN S.
Ajmal T. M. S/o Muhammed Kunju – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Tahsildar Kanayannur – Respondent
1. The demand raised under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the “Revenue Recovery Act”) is questioned in this writ petition on the ground that it is barred by limitation. The facts in the present writ petition disclose that the petitioner entered into a lease agreement with Greater Cochin Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as “GCDA”) as evident from Ext.P3, in respect of a shop room, which he had successfully bid at auction. Pursuant to the execution of the lease agreement, the petitioner was required to pay rent for the shop room he occupied. Petitioner has a case that he was not able to run the business for which the shop was taken on rent because of various extraneous factors, with which this Court is not concerned. On the expiration of the lease, it appears that the GCDA sent a requisition for revenue recovery for the recovery of arrears of rent.
2. I have heard the learned counsel, Sri. C.Y. Vinod Kumar, for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel, Smt. Mini V.A. for respondents 2 & 3.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the demand issued by the revenue recovery authorities on requisition of the GCDA is ba
Debt is not the same thing as right of action for its recovery – While debt is right in creditor with correlative duty on debtor right of action for recovery is in nature of a legal power.
Acknowledgments of debt reset the limitation period for recovery proceedings, and the SARFAESI Act does not bar revenue recovery actions under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act.
Article 137 of Limitation Act reads as description of application.
A lessor cannot unilaterally invoke revenue recovery for disputed rent; such disputes require adjudication in civil courts.
The court clarified the legal framework for recovering dues under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, emphasizing compliance with statutory limits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), though a statutory body, has its own identity different from the government and therefore, the suit for....
Realization of arrears of water charges is subject to a three-year limitation period as per the Limitation Act.
The limitation period for property tax recovery is three years, overriding general provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
