A. BADHARUDEEN
Fazid, S/o. Muhammed Faisal – Appellant
Versus
.......... – Respondent
Please provide the specific legal document content (to replace {content}) and your query or task. I'll then analyze it and respond with key points using the specified format, e.g.:
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of Cr.P.C. The revision petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.1375/2021 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Irinjalakkuda, where the prosecution alleges commission of the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 294(b), 354, 354-A(1), 354-C, 406 and 498A r/w Section 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. In this matter, Crl.M.P.No.4176/2023 was filed by the petitioners before the Magistrate Court seeking discharge on the allegations that no offences are made out from the prosecution records. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners that going by the order impugned, the same is not a reasoned order and nothing stated in the order to justify the dismissal of the discharge petition. He also submitted that the petitioners deserve discharge for want of sufficient materials to attract the offences alleged as per the prosecution records.
4. It is submitted further that the discharge petition should not be dismissed by a cryptic and non-s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.