C. PRATHEEP KUMAR
Kulangara Abdul Khader – Appellant
Versus
Dhashayani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Second Appeal has been preferred by the 5th defendant in the suit, O.S.No.143/2008 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Vatakara, who is also the 5th respondent in A.S.38/2009 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Vatakara against the judgment and decree dated 31.1.2013 allowing the appeal. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are hereafter referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.
2. The plaintiff who is the 1st respondent in the Second Appeal filed the Suit for pre-emption for enforcing preferential right available under Section 22(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The plaintiff is the widow and defendants 1 to 4 are the children of deceased Sankaran. The plaint schedule property originally belonged to Sankaran, and on his death, the property devolved upon the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 4. The defendants 1 to 4 assigned their 1/5 share each in the schedule property in favour of the 5th defendant as per Ext.A3 (Ext.B1) sale deed dated 2.6.2008, for a consideration of Rs.40,000/-. According to the plaintiff, by virtue of Section 22(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, she is entitled to preferential right to purchase the shares of defend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.